- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:27:34 -0500
- To: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
I plan to get started on this in a day or two, so let me know if you have suggestions, either technical, stylistic, or political. Jonathan On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> wrote: > (Check out the new http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/57 ...) > > Here is a DRAFT of a proposal for a plan (etc.) for AWWSW work related > to TAG ISSUE-57, based on recent discussions. > > We will prepare two products. > > 1. A background report giving the AWWSW TF's best description of the > issue, comprising > - brief history > - terminology and general analysis > - issues reported (deployment difficulty and performance problems > for httpRange-14 rule, mainly) > - enumeration and analysis of all plausible solutions known to the TF > ("plan B" solutions = {repeal of the rule + some way to refer > to an IR at a URI} being one set, "plan A" alternatives to 303 > such as .well-known being another set) > - references > > 2. An illustration 'ontology' that would permit expression of both > opt-in and opt-out to the httpRange-14 rule. The deliverable would > be two files, one of RDF and one of explanation and documentation. > This would be presented as *for discussion* - not ready for prime time. > > The purposes of the products would be to > * supply a basis for further community discussion of what to do > * help to recruit people to actively engage and to help out > * explain to the TAG what the problem is > * help the TAG decide how to further prosecute the issue (JAR suggested > rec track through TAG; Larry Masinter has suggested dropping it and > let the affected people run with it; that decision needs to be > informed) > > At the end, we present them to the community (including the TAG), then > get back to what we were doing before. > > ---- > This is not the whole AWWSW story; we also wanted to deal with > the rest of HTTP somehow - esp. 301/302/307, and maybe PUT. > > Jonathan >
Received on Monday, 7 March 2011 20:28:07 UTC