- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:27:34 -0500
- To: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
I plan to get started on this in a day or two, so let me know if you
have suggestions, either technical, stylistic, or political.
Jonathan
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> wrote:
> (Check out the new http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/57 ...)
>
> Here is a DRAFT of a proposal for a plan (etc.) for AWWSW work related
> to TAG ISSUE-57, based on recent discussions.
>
> We will prepare two products.
>
> 1. A background report giving the AWWSW TF's best description of the
> issue, comprising
> - brief history
> - terminology and general analysis
> - issues reported (deployment difficulty and performance problems
> for httpRange-14 rule, mainly)
> - enumeration and analysis of all plausible solutions known to the TF
> ("plan B" solutions = {repeal of the rule + some way to refer
> to an IR at a URI} being one set, "plan A" alternatives to 303
> such as .well-known being another set)
> - references
>
> 2. An illustration 'ontology' that would permit expression of both
> opt-in and opt-out to the httpRange-14 rule. The deliverable would
> be two files, one of RDF and one of explanation and documentation.
> This would be presented as *for discussion* - not ready for prime time.
>
> The purposes of the products would be to
> * supply a basis for further community discussion of what to do
> * help to recruit people to actively engage and to help out
> * explain to the TAG what the problem is
> * help the TAG decide how to further prosecute the issue (JAR suggested
> rec track through TAG; Larry Masinter has suggested dropping it and
> let the affected people run with it; that decision needs to be
> informed)
>
> At the end, we present them to the community (including the TAG), then
> get back to what we were doing before.
>
> ----
> This is not the whole AWWSW story; we also wanted to deal with
> the rest of HTTP somehow - esp. 301/302/307, and maybe PUT.
>
> Jonathan
>
Received on Monday, 7 March 2011 20:28:07 UTC