www-ws-desc@w3.org from May 2007 by author

Amelia A Lewis

WSDL 2.0 is PR! (Thursday, 31 May)
Re: [Bug 4380] Proposal for Assertion InterfaceMessageReference-0042 (Monday, 21 May)
Re: Discrepancy in Section 3.1 - Part 1 (Friday, 18 May)

Amy Lewis

RE: Discrepancy in Section 3.1 - Part 1 (Saturday, 19 May)

Arthur Ryman

Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR! (Thursday, 24 May)
Re: Two Questions on Extension Components in WSDL 2.0 (Tuesday, 22 May)
Re: Location of wsdl20.xsd in Part 1 (Friday, 18 May)
Re: Part 1 -> Table 2.1 - xs:base64, xs:Binary (Friday, 18 May)
RE: Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar? (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: unclarity in adjuncts 5.9.6 - soap header block component fragid (Wednesday, 2 May)
Re: a few Woden problems (Wednesday, 2 May)
Re: a few Woden problems (Wednesday, 2 May)

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

[Bug 4590] References (Tuesday, 29 May)
[Bug 4457] Comment on Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 0: Primer (Thursday, 17 May)
[Bug 4562] Editorial correction for RPC Signature (Thursday, 17 May)
[Bug 4563] {rpc signature} ambiguity (Thursday, 17 May)
[Bug 4562] Editorial correction for RPC Signature (Thursday, 17 May)
[Bug 4550] Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar? (Thursday, 10 May)
[Bug 4550] Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar? (Thursday, 10 May)
[Bug 4550] Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar? (Thursday, 10 May)

Charlton Barreto

Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR! (Thursday, 24 May)
RE: WSDL 2.0 is PR! (Thursday, 24 May)
Regrets for 5/10 telcon (Thursday, 10 May)

Jacek Kopecky

Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR! (Wednesday, 23 May)
issue 289 considerations (Sunday, 20 May)
WSDL RDF mapping implementation (Sunday, 20 May)
Re: unclarity in adjuncts 5.9.6 - soap header block component fragid (Saturday, 19 May)
extensions in WSDL CM, in Woden (Thursday, 3 May)
test suite bug (Thursday, 3 May)
Re: a few Woden problems (Wednesday, 2 May)
Re: a few Woden problems (Wednesday, 2 May)
Re: a few Woden problems (Wednesday, 2 May)
a few Woden problems (Wednesday, 2 May)
unclarity in adjuncts 5.9.6 - soap header block component fragid (Wednesday, 2 May)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR! (Thursday, 31 May)

John Kaputin (gmail)

{rpc signature} ambiguity causes 2 interchange failures for Woden (Monday, 14 May)
Editorial correction for RPC Signature (Monday, 14 May)
Re: Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar? (Tuesday, 8 May)
Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar? (Friday, 4 May)
Re: extensions in WSDL CM, in Woden (Friday, 4 May)
Re: a few Woden problems (Thursday, 3 May)

Jonathan Marsh

WSDL 2.0 is PR! (Wednesday, 23 May)
RE: {rpc signature} ambiguity causes 2 interchange failures for Woden (Thursday, 17 May)
RE: Editorial correction for RPC Signature (Thursday, 17 May)
Minutes, 10 May 2007 WS Description WG telcon (Thursday, 10 May)
Agenda: 10 May 2007 WS Description telcon (Thursday, 10 May)
RE: Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar? (Tuesday, 8 May)
RE: test suite bug (Thursday, 3 May)

keith chapman

FlickrClient Updated (Thursday, 10 May)

Lawrence Mandel

Re: a few Woden problems (Wednesday, 2 May)

Ramkumar Menon

Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR! (Thursday, 24 May)
Two Questions on Extension Components in WSDL 2.0 (Monday, 21 May)
Re: [Bug 4380] Proposal for Assertion InterfaceMessageReference-0042 (Monday, 21 May)
Re: Discrepancy in Section 3.1 - Part 1 (Friday, 18 May)
Part 1 -> Table 2.1 - xs:base64, xs:Binary (Thursday, 17 May)
Discrepancy in Section 3.1 - Part 1 (Thursday, 17 May)
Location of wsdl20.xsd in Part 1 (Thursday, 17 May)

Roberto Chinnici

Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR! (Wednesday, 30 May)

Rogers, Tony

RE: Editorial correction for RPC Signature (Friday, 18 May)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR! (Monday, 28 May)

Yalcinalp, Umit

RE: WSDL 2.0 is PR! (Wednesday, 30 May)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 May 2007 16:43:36 UTC