W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Discrepancy in Section 3.1 - Part 1

From: Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:21:39 -0700
Message-ID: <22bb8a4e0705181421t3f946a64v1a59bc0ad4bd8e74@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Amelia A Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Amie,
Apologies, but I did not mean to propose dropping the string "W3C" from the
section title :-) - that was an accident .
I only meant the change in the title to change "Description" to "Definition"
- period.
Sorry for the confusion.

What do you think ?


Ram


On 5/18/07, Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com> wrote:
>
> Please *don't*.
>
> Regardless of how generic the name claims it to be, it's still a W3C
> specification, and there's nothing wrong with calling it the *W3C* XML
> Schema Disaster.  I mean, Description.  Language.  Thing.  Whatever.
>
> Amy!
> On 2007-05-17 17:38:04 -0400 "Ramkumar Menon"
> <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Gurus,
> >
> > The title of section 3.1 in Part 1 says "Using W3C XML Schema
> > Description
> > Language".
> >
> > The acronym "XSD" expands to XML Schema Definition Language.
> >
> > I propose the change to the section title as "Using XML Schema
> > Definition
> > Language".
> >
> > regards,
> > Ram
> >
> >
>
> --
> Amelia A. Lewis
> Senior Architect
> TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
> alewis@tibco.com
>
>


-- 
Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!

-Ramkumar Menon
A typical Macroprocessor
Received on Friday, 18 May 2007 21:21:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:47 GMT