RE: Editorial correction for RPC Signature

I agree - this is not a substantive change, just a minor correction. But
up to Philippe to give us the yay/nay on process.
 
Tony Rogers
tony.rogers@ca.com <blocked::mailto:tony.rogers@ca.com> 
 

________________________________

From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
Sent: Thursday, 17 May 2007 10:30
To: 'John Kaputin (gmail)'; 'WS-Description WG'
Subject: RE: Editorial correction for RPC Signature



If not (up to Philippe I guess), then I see no harm in making this kind
of purely editorial correction when we issue the final Rec.

 

New bug: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4562

 

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com <http://www.wso2.com>  -
http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
<http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> 

 

From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of John Kaputin (gmail)
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 5:42 AM
To: WS-Description WG
Subject: Editorial correction for RPC Signature

 

I hope this editorial correction can still be made to the spec before
PR.

Part 2 Section 4.1.2 "XML Representation of the wrpc:signature
Extension" contains the text:

"The type of the name attribute information item is a list type ..."

I think the word 'name' is wrong. It should say:

"The type of the signature attribute information item is a list type
..."

regards,
John Kaputin