www-math@w3.org from April 2000 by date

Sunday, 30 April 2000

• Comments on MathML Last Call Draft sca@us.ibm.com
• Re: Translation to spanish aldiaz@us.ibm.com
• [www-math] <none> Luis Alvarez Sobreviela
• minor comments for WD-MathML2-20000328 Susan Lesch

Saturday, 29 April 2000

• [www-math] <none> Don & Kathy Hickerson
• Re: MathML 2.0 Last call Leszek Sczaniecki
• Reservations about <mchar> Roger B. Sidje

Friday, 28 April 2000

• Translation to spanish Marcelo Ramos
• [www-math] <none> Bill Wallie
• Missing Unicode points Roger B. Sidje

Thursday, 27 April 2000

• Re: Iterators/Apply-qualifiers in MathML 2.0(content) Andreas Strotmann
• Re: MathML 2.0 Last call aldiaz@us.ibm.com
• MathML 2.0 Last call HÃ¥kon Wium Lie

Wednesday, 26 April 2000

• Re: examples don't show that entities are deprecated William F. Hammond
• Re: examples don't show that entities are deprecated Robert Miner
• Re: examples don't show that entities are deprecated Robert Miner
• Re: examples don't show that entities are deprecated David Carlisle
• Re: examples don't show that entities are deprecated William F. Hammond
• Iterators/Apply-qualifiers in MathML 2.0(content) Je'ro^me Euzenat
• examples don't show that entities are deprecated Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 25 April 2000

• MathML Content2Presentation Transformation aldiaz@us.ibm.com
• Re: DOM WG comments on the MathML 2 Last Call aldiaz@us.ibm.com
• DOM WG comments on the MathML 2 Last Call Lauren Wood

Sunday, 23 April 2000

• [www-math] <none> Andrew Evans

Thursday, 20 April 2000

• [question]searching mathematical Á¶ÇöÁÖ

Wednesday, 19 April 2000

• Re: MINSE -- Was Re: The disappointment ... Ka-Ping Yee
• Re: MINSE -- Was Re: The disappointment ... Ka-Ping Yee
• MINSE -- Was Re: The disappointment ... William F. Hammond
• Re: The disappointment and embarrassment of MathML (update) Ka-Ping Yee

Tuesday, 18 April 2000

• Re: The disappointment and embarrassment of MathML (update) Pankaj Kamthan
• [www-math] <none> Ano Doukas
• Re: The disappointment and embarrassment of MathML (update) Walter T. Stephens

Sunday, 16 April 2000

• The disappointment and embarrassment of MathML (update) Thomas Cool

Saturday, 15 April 2000

• a very old, prophetic quotation Andreas Strotmann

Friday, 14 April 2000

• Re: The disappointment and embarrasment of MathML (fwd) Luis Alvarez
• Re: xsl: mathml to latex? aldiaz@us.ibm.com
• Re: xsl: mathml to latex? David Carlisle
• Re: xsl: mathml to latex? Pankaj Kamthan
• xsl: mathml to latex? Jochen Schmidt
• Re: The disappointment and embarrasment of MathML Pankaj Kamthan

Thursday, 13 April 2000

• Re: The disappointment and embarrasment of MathML Ka-Ping Yee
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 William F. Hammond
• Re: The disappointment and embarrasment of MathML Neil Soiffer
• The misunderstanding of MathML (Re: The disappointment and embarrasment of MathML) Andreas Strotmann
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 Stan Devitt
• The disappointment and embarrasment of MathML Thomas Cool
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 William F. Hammond
• Re: binding in openmath David Carlisle
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 Stan Devitt

Wednesday, 12 April 2000

• binding in openmath Leonardo B. Lopes
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 William F. Hammond
• Re: standard usage of O(x^3) can be confusing Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor
• Re: standard usage of O(x^3) can be confusing Stan Devitt
• Re: standard usage of O(x^3) can be confusing David Eppstein
• Re: standard usage of O(x^3) can be confusing Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor
• Re: standard usage of O(x^3) can be confusing David Eppstein
• Re: xml:lang und kgV / ggT ;-) Stan Devitt
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 Stan Devitt
• Re: xml:lang und kgV / ggT ;-) William F. Hammond
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 William F. Hammond
• some fundamental omissions Andreas Strotmann

Tuesday, 11 April 2000

• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 David Carlisle
• xml:lang und kgV / ggT ;-) Andreas Strotmann
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 hutch@psfc.mit.edu
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 David Carlisle
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 William F. Hammond
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 William F. Hammond
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 hutch@psfc.mit.edu
• Re: standard usage of O(x^3) can be confusing Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 David Carlisle
• Re: re Optimisation / Sparse Matrices (plain text) David Carlisle
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 William F. Hammond
• Re: re Optimisation / Sparse Matrices (plain text) Leonardo B. Lopes
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 Stan Devitt
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 Robert Miner
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 William F. Hammond
• [www-math] <none> Rod Harris
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 David Eppstein
• standard usage of O(x^3) can be confusing Stan Devitt
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 Stan Devitt
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 Stan Devitt
• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 David Eppstein

Monday, 10 April 2000

• Re: [www-math] <none> Dhruv Moondhra
• Re: re Optimisation / Sparse Matrices (plain text) Stan Devitt
• re Optimisation / Sparse Matrices Stan Devitt
• re: comments re draft version 2.0 (David Eppstein) Stan Devitt
• Subject: comments re draft version 2.0 (David Eppstein) Stan Devitt

Thursday, 8 April 100

• Definition of Moment J H Davenport

Tuesday, 4 April 2000

• Re: recap: MathML2 2nd WD (long) David Carlisle

Monday, 3 April 2000

• Re: comments re draft version 2.0 Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor

Sunday, 2 April 2000

• comments re draft version 2.0 David Eppstein

Last message date: Sunday, 30 April 2000 23:27:40 UTC