- From: Andreas Strotmann <strotman@nu.cs.fsu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:29:54 -0400 (EDT)
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- cc: www-math@w3.org
Hi, I think I mentioned a similar problem before, but it occurred to me only recently when going through the content specs again that there are a couple of cases of content markup where the default rendering is explicitly language-dependent (even more so than in the case of different digit character sets). I'm talking, of course, about lcm and gcd. As in English, the German language default rendering of this operator consists of the first letters of the term used to denote this concept, and I suspect that many more languages use that technique common to German and English, too. Hence, in German, the default rendering for <gcd/> is ggT (notice the mixed lower/uppercase) for "groesster gemeinsamer Teiler", and that for <lcm/> is kgV for "kleinstes gemeinsames Vielfaches". Since XML explicitly prescribes the xml:lang (sp?) attribute for this purpose, I submit that MathML needs to add some general comments as to its use in driving the rendering process to some extent in the appropriate places, and some specific comments for the lcm and gcd cases. Indeed, in the latter cases I think that examples with default renderings in a couple of different languages might be in order. Note that this is different from the case where different 2D layouts are used in different mathematical cultures. In this case, the same basic layout and naming technique is used; it's just that the underlying language from which the components of the rendering are derived differ from language to language. Hence, xml:lang (instead of a locale parameter) is the correct parameter in these cases (and probably in other <csymbol/> cases) to derive the correct rendering specifics from. -- Andreas ____________________________________________________________ "The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice." - G.K.Chesterton: A Defense of Humilities, The Defendant, 1901 www.chesterton.org/acs/quotes.htm
Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2000 19:29:59 UTC