public-webrtc@w3.org from November 2012 by author

Adam Bergkvist

• Re: V2 of DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Monday, 19 November)
• Re: DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: New API surface - inbound outbound streams/tracks (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: New API surface - inbound outbound streams/tracks (Wednesday, 14 November)
• Re: New API surface - inbound outbound streams/tracks (Monday, 12 November)
• Re: New API surface - inbound outbound streams/tracks (Monday, 12 November)
• New API surface - inbound outbound streams/tracks (Friday, 9 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Tuesday, 6 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Tuesday, 6 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Monday, 5 November)
• [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: [rtcweb] summary of issues raised at W3C meeting (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: Synchronous getUserMedia proposal (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: syntax error in WebRTC latest spec (Monday, 5 November)

Alexey Aylarov

• Re: Don't hurry with WebRTC release (in Chrome) (Thursday, 1 November)

Anant Narayanan

• Re: Signaling server... necesary? (Sunday, 11 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Monday, 5 November)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 19580] Callbacks need to be called asynchronously (Wednesday, 7 November)
• [Bug 19857] onnegotationneeded syntax error (Monday, 5 November)
• [Bug 19857] New: onnegotationneeded syntax error (Monday, 5 November)

Cullen Jennings (fluffy)

• Requiring a non default constructor for RTCIceCandidate (Wednesday, 21 November)
• Re: [minutes] WebRTC F2F Oct 29-30 (Saturday, 17 November)
• Re: [minutes] WebRTC F2F Oct 29-30 (Friday, 16 November)
• Doodle poll for interim meeting in Jan / Feb (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: Face-to-face meeting in February for WebRTC (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: Face-to-face meeting in February for WebRTC (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: W3C's position on RTCWEB mandatory to implement video codec (Tuesday, 13 November)
• Privacy and browser use of contents of the video session (Saturday, 3 November)
• Re: [rtcweb] summary of issues raised at W3C meeting (Friday, 2 November)

Dan Burnett

• Re: Face-to-face meeting in February for WebRTC (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: Face-to-face meeting in February for WebRTC (Thursday, 15 November)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• [minutes] WebRTC F2F Oct 29-30 (Thursday, 15 November)

Eric Rescorla

• Re: Requiring a non default constructor for RTCIceCandidate (Thursday, 22 November)
• Re: Privacy and browser use of contents of the video session (Saturday, 3 November)

Gunnar Hellström

• Re: [rtcweb] Text communication in RTCWEB sessions -job overview (Wednesday, 21 November)

Göran Eriksson AP

• Re: [minutes] WebRTC F2F Oct 29-30 (Saturday, 17 November)
• Re: [minutes] WebRTC F2F Oct 29-30 (Saturday, 17 November)

Harald Alvestrand

• Minor stats fix (Wednesday, 21 November)
• Re: Synchronous getUserMedia proposal (Monday, 19 November)
• Re: V2 of DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Monday, 19 November)
• Re: V2 of DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Monday, 19 November)
• Re: V2 of DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Monday, 19 November)
• Re: DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Friday, 16 November)
• V2 of DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] V2: Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Thursday, 15 November)
• DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Wednesday, 14 November)
• Re: New API surface - inbound outbound streams/tracks (Tuesday, 13 November)
• Re: Signaling server... necesary? (Sunday, 11 November)
• Re: New API surface - inbound outbound streams/tracks (Friday, 9 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Tuesday, 6 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Tuesday, 6 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: Don't hurry with WebRTC release (in Chrome) (Thursday, 1 November)

Hutton, Andrew

• RE: Face-to-face meeting in February for WebRTC (Thursday, 15 November)

Iskren Chernev

• syntax error in WebRTC latest spec (Wednesday, 31 October)

Jim Barnett

• RE: V2 of DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Friday, 16 November)
• RE: DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Friday, 16 November)
• RE: Face-to-face meeting in February for WebRTC (Thursday, 15 November)
• RE: New API surface - inbound outbound streams/tracks (Tuesday, 13 November)
• RE: New API surface - inbound outbound streams/tracks (Monday, 12 November)

Joseph Lorenzo Hall

• Re: Privacy and browser use of contents of the video session (Saturday, 3 November)

Li Li

• RE: Synchronous getUserMedia proposal (Friday, 16 November)

Martin Thomson

• Re: Requiring a non default constructor for RTCIceCandidate (Wednesday, 21 November)
• Re: V2 of DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Monday, 19 November)
• Re: V2 of DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: Synchronous getUserMedia proposal (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: New API surface - inbound outbound streams/tracks (Tuesday, 13 November)
• Re: New API surface - inbound outbound streams/tracks (Tuesday, 13 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: Synchronous getUserMedia proposal (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: List of items noted during f2f (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: Synchronous getUserMedia proposal (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: List of items noted during f2f (Sunday, 4 November)
• Re: [rtcweb] summary of issues raised at W3C meeting (Friday, 2 November)
• Synchronous getUserMedia proposal (Friday, 2 November)

Matthew Kaufman

• RE: V2 of DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Friday, 16 November)
• RE: Face-to-face meeting in February for WebRTC (Thursday, 15 November)
• RE: [rtcweb] summary of issues raised at W3C meeting (Friday, 2 November)
• RE: [rtcweb] summary of issues raised at W3C meeting (Friday, 2 November)
• summary of issues raised at W3C meeting (Friday, 2 November)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• W3C's position on RTCWEB mandatory to implement video codec (Friday, 2 November)

piranna@gmail.com

• Signaling server... necesary? (Sunday, 11 November)
• Re: Privacy and browser use of contents of the video session (Saturday, 3 November)

Randell Jesup

• Re: [rtcweb] Text communication in RTCWEB sessions -job overview (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: [rtcweb] Text communication in RTCWEB sessions -job overview (Monday, 19 November)

Roman Shpount

• Re: V2 of DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Friday, 16 November)

Serge Lachapelle

• Re: Don't hurry with WebRTC release (in Chrome) (Wednesday, 31 October)

Stefan Hakansson LK

• Face to face meeting: dates and location decided (Friday, 30 November)
• Re: Date and time for next teleconf (Friday, 23 November)
• Date and time for next teleconf (Friday, 23 November)
• Fwd: [rtcweb] Doodle poll for Face to Face Interim in Boston (Wednesday, 21 November)
• Re: Poll for WebRTC Telco (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Update: Face-to-face meeting in February for WebRTC (January) (Sunday, 18 November)
• Re: [minutes] WebRTC F2F Oct 29-30 (Sunday, 18 November)
• Re: V2 of DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: Synchronous getUserMedia proposal (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: Face-to-face meeting in February for WebRTC (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: Face-to-face meeting in February for WebRTC (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: [minutes] WebRTC F2F Oct 29-30 (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Thursday, 15 November)
• Face-to-face meeting in February for WebRTC (Thursday, 15 November)
• Poll for WebRTC Telco (Wednesday, 14 November)
• Re: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Tuesday, 6 November)
• Re: Synchronous getUserMedia proposal (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: Synchronous getUserMedia proposal (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: List of items noted during f2f (Monday, 5 November)

Stefan Håkansson LK

• List of items noted during f2f (Sunday, 4 November)

Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)

• RE: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Monday, 5 November)

Sunyang (Eric)

• RE: V2 of DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Tuesday, 20 November)
• RE: DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Friday, 16 November)
• RE: DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Friday, 16 November)
• RE: DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Friday, 16 November)
• RE: DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Friday, 16 November)
• RE: DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Friday, 16 November)
• RE: DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Friday, 16 November)
• RE: DTMF - the "Object Oriented" approach (Friday, 16 November)
• RE: New API surface - inbound outbound streams/tracks (Thursday, 15 November)
• RE: New API surface - inbound outbound streams/tracks (Thursday, 15 November)
• RE: New API surface - inbound outbound streams/tracks (Thursday, 15 November)

Thomas Roessler

• Re: W3C's position on RTCWEB mandatory to implement video codec (Friday, 2 November)

Timothy B. Terriberry

• Re: [rtcweb] summary of issues raised at W3C meeting (Friday, 2 November)

Travis Leithead

• RE: Synchronous getUserMedia proposal (Wednesday, 14 November)
• RE: [ACTION-59] Introduce lookup by id structures for streams and tracks. (Wednesday, 14 November)

ᛏᚮᛘᛘᚤ

• Re: New API surface - inbound outbound streams/tracks (Monday, 12 November)
• Re: New API surface - inbound outbound streams/tracks (Monday, 12 November)

Last message date: Friday, 30 November 2012 11:18:22 UTC