Re: Requiring a non default constructor for RTCIceCandidate

I believe it currently produces a candidate with all values === null.

Which doesn't make any sense.

Also, the text seems to currently require that the candidates and mSdpLine
fields
be non-null. I would suggest that the grammar require that as well.

-Ekr


On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Martin Thomson
<martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 21 November 2012 11:39, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Any complaints if we change Constructor for RTCIceCandidate
>
> Seems OK to me.  What does this do anyway:
>
> var c = new RTCIceCandidate();
>
> ?
>
>