public-w3process@w3.org from June 2013 by author

Arthur Barstow

• Please make w3process Tracker instance report all new Actions and Issues to the list (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Priorities (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: A possible solution to defining "widely reviewed" (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: A possible solution to defining "widely reviewed" (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: A possible solution to defining "widely reviewed" (Thursday, 13 June)
• Towards getting agreement on the High Priority TR Issues [Was: Re: ISSUE-10 Raising awareness before CR] (Monday, 10 June)
• W3C Process: Tracking Issues, Bugs and Actions [via Revising W3C Process Community Group] (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: A proposal for a new Recommendation Track [via Revising W3C Process Community Group] (Thursday, 6 June)
• Plea for Mail list etiquette agreement for w3process list [Was: other stuff ...] (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: A proposal for a new Recommendation Track [via Revising W3C Process Community Group] (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: Proc Doc: time to Slash and Burn, Divide and Conquer, or what? (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Proc Doc: time to Slash and Burn, Divide and Conquer, or what? (Tuesday, 4 June)

Chaals

• A proposal for a new Recommendation Track [via Revising W3C Process Community Group] (Wednesday, 5 June)

Charles McCathie Nevile

• Re: Priorities (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: ISSUE-10 Raising awareness before CR (Monday, 10 June)
• Cross-posting: Please don't. Re: List of issues on Chapter 7. (Monday, 10 June)
• tracker - please use it Re: List of issues on Chapter 7. (Monday, 10 June)
• Using this Mailing list Re: Plea for Mail list etiquette agreement for w3process list [Was: other stuff ...] (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Coming back in (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: A proposal for a new Recommendation Track [via Revising W3C Process Community Group] (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: Proc Doc: time to Slash and Burn, Divide and Conquer, or what? (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Proc Doc: time to Slash and Burn, Divide and Conquer, or what? (Monday, 3 June)

Charles McCathie Nevile via RT

• [sysreq #7104] Re: Please make w3process Tracker instance report all new Actions and Issues to the list (Wednesday, 26 June)

Jeff Jaffe

• Re: Priorities (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: A possible solution to defining "widely reviewed" (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: A possible solution to defining "widely reviewed" (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: A possible solution to defining "widely reviewed" (Thursday, 13 June)

Karl Dubost

• Re: ISSUE-10 Raising awareness before CR (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: tracker - please use it Re: List of issues on Chapter 7. (Monday, 10 June)

Larry Masinter

• forking specifications; normative references to "latest versions"; public specs that enable proprietary extensions (Monday, 10 June)
• ISSUE-10 Raising awareness before CR (Monday, 10 June)
• RE: Proc Doc: time to Slash and Burn, Divide and Conquer, or what? (Wednesday, 5 June)

Rand McRanderson

• Re: ISSUE-10 Raising awareness before CR (Sunday, 16 June)

Scheppe Kai

• Coming back in (Wednesday, 5 June)

Stephen Zilles

• A possible solution to defining "widely reviewed" (Thursday, 13 June)
• List of issues on Chapter 7. (Sunday, 9 June)
• Re: What to slash Re: Proc Doc: time to Slash and Burn, Divide and Conquer, or what? (Wednesday, 5 June)
• RE: Proc Doc: time to Slash and Burn, Divide and Conquer, or what? (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Proc Doc: time to Slash and Burn, Divide and Conquer, or what? (Tuesday, 4 June)

Vivien Lacourba via RT

• [sysreq #7104] Please make w3process Tracker instance report all new Actions and Issues to the list (Thursday, 27 June)

Wayne Carr

• Re: ISSUE-10 Raising awareness before CR (Friday, 14 June)

Last message date: Thursday, 27 June 2013 15:39:51 UTC