Re: Proc Doc: time to Slash and Burn, Divide and Conquer, or what?

On 6/3/13 5:52 PM, ext Charles McCathie Nevile wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:35:56 +0400, Arthur Barstow 
> <art.barstow@nokia.com>
> wrote:
> ...
>>
>> Sections that should require consensus before updating:
>
> Whose consensus?
>
> I think the answer here is "The members" - i.e. the Advisory Committee.
>
>> * 7. Tech Reports process.

Re "consensus by whom?" - if the TR process is going to change, there 
should be some type of CfC/RfC of the Draft that is open to the Public 
(which includes Members). Similar to a LCWD review for a spec.

-AB

Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 11:14:00 UTC