- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 08:10:06 -0400
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- CC: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 6/10/13 4:25 AM, ext Karl Dubost wrote: > Larry, > > Larry Masinter [2013-06-10T14:24]: >> Karl, thanks for doing this. > no issue. I had a bit of time today. > >> But I would like to see if there's more clarity about what the problems are, somewhat independent of the proposed solution > me too. I first want to know: > > What is "Charles’ draft of a revised Chapter 7 of the Process Document."? Tied to this issue. Hard to discuss the issue without the draft to point to it. I agree with Karl and Larry that we've got a bit of a "cart before the horse" issue here (I am already on record [1] asking for a list of the problems and issues addressed by Chaals' proposals). It seems sub-optimal to start the conversation with a proposal when we don't have agreement on the problem space, especially the High Priority bugs/issues. As such, perhaps it would be more efficient to start with "today's" TR process i.e. <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html> and that people submit issues and bugs against that document as well as submit change requests that address a specific bug/issue. -AB [1] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2013Jun/0008.html>
Received on Monday, 10 June 2013 12:10:55 UTC