public-soap-jms@w3.org from July 2009 by author

Amelia A Lewis

• action item: frequently-asked questions review and additions (Monday, 27 July)

Eric Johnson

• Action item 95 complete (Wednesday, 29 July)
• NEW ISSUE: Incorrect example, section C2 (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Assertion Protocol-2041 is spurious (Wednesday, 29 July)
• NEW ISSUE: Assertion Protocol-2041 is spurious (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Re: Action 94: Revised proposal for requestURI testable assertions (Tuesday, 28 July)
• NEW ISSUE: Protocol 2039 redundant, missing RFC 2119 language (Monday, 27 July)
• Agenda for 2009-07-28 conference call (Monday, 27 July)
• NEW ISSUE: Protocol 2035 is redundant (Monday, 27 July)
• NEW ISSUE: Protocol-2024 does not include RFC-2119 language, has large associated table (Monday, 27 July)
• NEW ISSUE: Assertion Protocol-2023 missing RFC 2119 (Monday, 27 July)
• NEW ISSUE: Assertion Protocol-2020 missing RFC 2119 language (Monday, 27 July)
• NEW ISSUE: Assertion Protocol-2013 is missing RFC 2119 language (Saturday, 25 July)
• Updates to FAQ wiki page (Tuesday, 21 July)
• Proposed questions for our FAQ (Tuesday, 21 July)
• Agenda for 2009-07-21 conference call (Tuesday, 21 July)
• This is out of scope of our charter, but what about UDDI? (Friday, 17 July)
• Agenda for 2009-07-14 conference call (Monday, 13 July)
• Reminder: no meeting on July 7 (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Typo/mistake in the CR for SOAP-JMS (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Updated JMS URI draft (Wednesday, 1 July)

Mark Phillips

• IBM approval for use of trust 2902 URI (Friday, 31 July)
• Minutes 2009-07-28 (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Action 94: Revised proposal for requestURI testable assertions (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Minutes 2009-07-21 (Tuesday, 21 July)
• Action 92: "Propose the wording for the change to split 2024 into three testable assertions" (Tuesday, 21 July)
• Re: Proposed questions for our FAQ (Tuesday, 21 July)
• Minutes 2009-07-14 (Tuesday, 14 July)

Peter Easton

• RE: Agenda for 2009-07-28 conference call (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Regrets 7/21/9 (Tuesday, 21 July)
• Re: ACTION-90 Follow up contacts with CXF to find out timeframes etc (Tuesday, 14 July)

SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-8 (Incorrect example, section C2): Example in C2 contrary to Protocol-2029 [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (Wednesday, 29 July)
• ISSUE-7 (Protocol-2041 is spurious): Protocol-2041 is spurious [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (Wednesday, 29 July)
• ISSUE-6 (Protocol 2039 redundant): Protocol 2039 redundant, missing RFC 2119 language [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (Tuesday, 28 July)
• ISSUE-5 (Protocol-2035 is redundant): Protocol-2035 is redundant [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (Monday, 27 July)
• ISSUE-4 (Protocol-2024 needs restructuring): Protocol-2024 does not include RFC-2119 language, has large associated table (Monday, 27 July)
• ISSUE-3 (Protocol-2023 is spurious): Assertion Protocol-2023 missing RFC 2119 language [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (Monday, 27 July)
• ISSUE-2 (Protocol-2020 is spurious): Assertion Protocol-2020 missing RFC 2119 language [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (Monday, 27 July)
• ISSUE-1 (Assert Protocol-2013 is spurious): Assertion Protocol-2013 is missing RFC 2119 language [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (Monday, 27 July)

Yuh-Jong Hu

• Call for Submissions for 3rd International Rules Challenge (Saturday, 18 July)

Yves Lafon

• Re: Agenda for 2009-07-14 conference call (Tuesday, 14 July)

Last message date: Friday, 31 July 2009 17:33:26 UTC