public-soap-jms@w3.org from July 2009 by subject

Action 92: "Propose the wording for the change to split 2024 into three testable assertions"

• Mark Phillips (Tuesday, 21 July)

Action 94: Revised proposal for requestURI testable assertions

• Eric Johnson (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Mark Phillips (Tuesday, 28 July)

Action item 95 complete

• Eric Johnson (Wednesday, 29 July)

action item: frequently-asked questions review and additions

• Amelia A Lewis (Monday, 27 July)

ACTION-90 Follow up contacts with CXF to find out timeframes etc

• Peter Easton (Tuesday, 14 July)

Agenda for 2009-07-14 conference call

• Yves Lafon (Tuesday, 14 July)
• Eric Johnson (Monday, 13 July)

Agenda for 2009-07-21 conference call

• Eric Johnson (Tuesday, 21 July)

Agenda for 2009-07-28 conference call

• Peter Easton (Tuesday, 28 July)
• Eric Johnson (Monday, 27 July)

Call for Submissions for 3rd International Rules Challenge

• Yuh-Jong Hu (Saturday, 18 July)

IBM approval for use of trust 2902 URI

• Mark Phillips (Friday, 31 July)

ISSUE-1 (Assert Protocol-2013 is spurious): Assertion Protocol-2013 is missing RFC 2119 language [SOAP-JMS Binding specification]

• SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 27 July)

ISSUE-2 (Protocol-2020 is spurious): Assertion Protocol-2020 missing RFC 2119 language [SOAP-JMS Binding specification]

• SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 27 July)

ISSUE-3 (Protocol-2023 is spurious): Assertion Protocol-2023 missing RFC 2119 language [SOAP-JMS Binding specification]

• SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 27 July)

ISSUE-4 (Protocol-2024 needs restructuring): Protocol-2024 does not include RFC-2119 language, has large associated table

• SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 27 July)

ISSUE-5 (Protocol-2035 is redundant): Protocol-2035 is redundant [SOAP-JMS Binding specification]

• SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 27 July)

ISSUE-6 (Protocol 2039 redundant): Protocol 2039 redundant, missing RFC 2119 language [SOAP-JMS Binding specification]

• SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker (Tuesday, 28 July)

ISSUE-7 (Protocol-2041 is spurious): Protocol-2041 is spurious [SOAP-JMS Binding specification]

• SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 29 July)

ISSUE-8 (Incorrect example, section C2): Example in C2 contrary to Protocol-2029 [SOAP-JMS Binding specification]

• SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 29 July)

Minutes 2009-07-14

• Mark Phillips (Tuesday, 14 July)

Minutes 2009-07-21

• Mark Phillips (Tuesday, 21 July)

Minutes 2009-07-28

• Mark Phillips (Tuesday, 28 July)

NEW ISSUE: Assertion Protocol-2013 is missing RFC 2119 language

• Eric Johnson (Saturday, 25 July)

NEW ISSUE: Assertion Protocol-2020 missing RFC 2119 language

• Eric Johnson (Monday, 27 July)

NEW ISSUE: Assertion Protocol-2023 missing RFC 2119

• Eric Johnson (Monday, 27 July)

NEW ISSUE: Assertion Protocol-2041 is spurious

• Eric Johnson (Wednesday, 29 July)
• Eric Johnson (Wednesday, 29 July)

NEW ISSUE: Incorrect example, section C2

• Eric Johnson (Wednesday, 29 July)

NEW ISSUE: Protocol 2035 is redundant

• Eric Johnson (Monday, 27 July)

NEW ISSUE: Protocol 2039 redundant, missing RFC 2119 language

• Eric Johnson (Monday, 27 July)

NEW ISSUE: Protocol-2024 does not include RFC-2119 language, has large associated table

• Eric Johnson (Monday, 27 July)

Proposed questions for our FAQ

• Mark Phillips (Tuesday, 21 July)
• Eric Johnson (Tuesday, 21 July)

Regrets 7/21/9

• Peter Easton (Tuesday, 21 July)

Reminder: no meeting on July 7

• Eric Johnson (Tuesday, 7 July)

This is out of scope of our charter, but what about UDDI?

• Eric Johnson (Friday, 17 July)

Typo/mistake in the CR for SOAP-JMS

• Eric Johnson (Wednesday, 1 July)

Updated JMS URI draft

• Eric Johnson (Wednesday, 1 July)

Updates to FAQ wiki page

• Eric Johnson (Tuesday, 21 July)

Last message date: Friday, 31 July 2009 17:33:26 UTC