Re: NEW ISSUE: Assertion Protocol-2041 is spurious

Ooops - worth noting that my proposal below was incorrect - it should
have removed the marker for the normative statement.  I've updated the
entry in the issue tracker.

-Eric

Eric Johnson wrote:
> Title: Protocol-2041 is spurious
> 
> Description:
> ------------
> In section 2.7.1, the assertion for Protocol-2041 reads:
> "the following table specifies how the binding properties described
> earlier explicitly affect the message constructed."
> 
> Neither this statement, nor the following table actually have any
> normative requirements.  Normative constraint appears to be completely
> spurious.
> 
> Justification:
> --------------
> Hoping to remove unnecessary normative statements.
> 
> Proposal:
> ---------
> Change this:
> "A number of the message header properties are implicitly created by the
> use of the JMS API, the following table specifies how the binding
> properties described earlier explicitly affect the message constructed.^† "
> 
> To this:
> "A number of the message header properties are implicitly created by the
> use of the JMS API. The following table shows how the binding properties
> described earlier explicitly affect the message constructed.^† "
> 
> -Eric Johnson
> 
>