5658 restore accidental change to smlif:identityType
5659 schemaComplete default value
5676 schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location
5679 fix disparity between SML & SML-IF specs regarding SML ref targets
[Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model"
[Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme'
[Bug 5390] How to handle non-embedded documents referenced by EPRs in SML-IF
[Bug 5492] xs:schema lines too long
[Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ]
[Bug 5505] wrong type for schemaBinding/namespaceBinding/namespace attribute
[Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink
[Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined
[Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence?
[Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear
[Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI
[Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1
[Bug 5525] Confusing section names
[Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean?
[Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary
[Bug 5529] Clarify Appendix C
[Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?
[Bug 5544] Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element?
[Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986
[Bug 5561] SML should define a Simple XLink Reference Scheme
[Bug 5562] SML should define an XHTML href Reference Scheme
[Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution
[Bug 5635] impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined
[Bug 5645] remove spurious ns1 binding from appendix A and reflow line
[Bug 5653] Final vocabulary clean-up
[Bug 5656] Defining interoperability for user-defined reference schemes
[Bug 5657] Define implementation-defined and -dependent, use consistently
[Bug 5658] restore accidental change to smlif:identityType
[Bug 5659] schemaComplete default value
[Bug 5676] schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location
[Bug 5678] locid is missing from schema in editors draft
[Bug 5679] fix disparity between SML & SML-IF specs regarding SML ref targets
[Bug 5680] fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example
[Bug 5707] clarify SML reference resolution when sml:uri value is an empty string
[Bug 5710] Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.1 - mismatch of definitions
[Bug 5711] Fuzzy phrase: "essentially the same".
[Bug 5712] Missing word "global" in schema annotation.
[Bug 5713] Minor wording issue in Appendix E
[Bug 5715] add definition of the term 'processor'
[Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes
[Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help
[w3c sml] [EPR Note] Response to Comment #9, Issue 5431
[w3c sml] sml:ref and interoperability
[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-05-15 SML Telecon
[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-05-20 SML Telecon
[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-05-29 SML Telecon
[w3c sml][agenda] v2 2008-05-15 SML Telecon
[w3c sml][agenda][v2] 2008-05-01 SML Telecon
[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-05-01 SML Teleconference
[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-05-15 SML Teleconference
[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-05-22 SML
bugs in "surprising" (to me) states
discussion on : 5544 Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element?
interoperability is... ? (was: SML interop test plan)
regrets for 5/8 and 5/15
SML interop test plan
support for shorthand (barename) pointers : summary of discussion at f2f
Last message date: Saturday, 31 May 2008 04:16:08 UTC