W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sml@w3.org > May 2008

RE: SML interop test plan

From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 09:13:10 -0400
To: "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFEC4F5441.36AA0CB8-ON8525743F.00529BFC-85257440.00489FEB@us.ibm.com>
couple of comments



Best Regards, John

Street address: 2455 South Road, P328 Poughkeepsie, NY USA 12601
Voice: 1+845-435-9470      Fax: 1+845-432-9787



From:
Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>
To:
"Smith, Virginia (HP Software)" <virginia.smith@hp.com>, 
"public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>
Cc:
Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>
Date:
04/15/2008 10:27 PM
Subject:
RE: SML interop test plan



Good suggestions for numbering. Here is the updated pdf with 
section/page/line numbers. I have also attached the source word document.
 
I agree about not needing to duplicate the IF format since we can readily 
use IF itself. The support for locator element is optional. Not all 
implementations may support it which makes it hard to use for interop 
testing. However, the bigger problem with multiple files is that of change 
management. Change to one file may affect many tests and thus each person 
making a change will need to run all implementations against all tests to 
ensure no breaks. This is one of the reasons why the document recommends a 
single SML-IF file per test case.
 
 
From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On 
Behalf Of Smith, Virginia (HP Software)
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 3:48 PM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Subject: RE: SML interop test plan
 
Nice work on the doc, Kumar. 
 
I have a question on the test-description file – 1b. It seems like you 
wouldn’t have to recreate the IF format – you could just use the IF format 
for the test harness, probably with the locator element. So the test 
harness would just have to embed the appropriate documents into a final IF 
file to run the test. And 2d would still apply here.
 
I also recommend adding page number and line numbers for easy reference - 
especially if you are not providing a word doc that can be marked up.
 
--
ginny
 
 
From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On 
Behalf Of Kumar Pandit
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 9:31 PM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Cc: Kumar Pandit
Subject: SML interop test plan
 
Here is the first draft of SML interop test plan. Please review and send 
your feedback.
 
I have not included the list of tests because I need to make some updates. 
I will send it later.[attachment "sml-interop-test-plan.doc" deleted by 
John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM] [attachment "sml-interop-test-plan.pdf" 
deleted by John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM] 



Received on Monday, 5 May 2008 13:13:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 5 May 2008 13:13:59 GMT