+1 On May 7, 2008, at 7:45 PM, Kumar Pandit wrote: > This was an accidental editorial change. I do not anticipate any > disagreement on this one. Please reply to indicate whether you agree > with the proposal. > > From the bug: > ========= > > Some editor seems to have swapped the position of baseURI and > description > elements within smlif:identityType. This must be accidental change > since I do > not recall any WG decision leading to this change. This breaks all > existing > SML-IF models. > > Proposal: > Change the definition of identityType: > > from: > <xs:complexType name="identityType"> > <xs:sequence> > ... ... > <xs:element name="description" type="smlif:displayType" > minOccurs="0"/> > <xs:element name="baseURI" type="smlif:uriType" minOccurs="0"/> > ... ... > </xs:sequence> > <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/> > </xs:complexType> > > to: > <xs:complexType name="identityType"> > <xs:sequence> > ... ... > <xs:element name="baseURI" type="smlif:uriType" minOccurs="0"/> > <xs:element name="description" type="smlif:displayType" > minOccurs="0"/> > ... ... > </xs:sequence> > <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/> > </xs:complexType> >Received on Thursday, 8 May 2008 13:18:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:56:11 UTC