public-sml@w3.org from May 2008 by author

bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org

• [Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence? (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 5562] SML should define an XHTML href Reference Scheme (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986 (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence? (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 5492] xs:schema lines too long (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes (Thursday, 29 May)
• [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help (Wednesday, 28 May)
• [Bug 5710] Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.1 - mismatch of definitions (Wednesday, 28 May)
• [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes (Wednesday, 28 May)
• [Bug 5711] Fuzzy phrase: "essentially the same". (Wednesday, 28 May)
• [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes (Wednesday, 28 May)
• [Bug 5715] add definition of the term 'processor' (Friday, 23 May)
• [Bug 5712] Missing word "global" in schema annotation. (Friday, 23 May)
• [Bug 5713] Minor wording issue in Appendix E (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5713] Minor wording issue in Appendix E (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5658] restore accidental change to smlif:identityType (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5676] schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5659] schemaComplete default value (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5707] clarify SML reference resolution when sml:uri value is an empty string (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5680] fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ] (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5679] fix disparity between SML & SML-IF specs regarding SML ref targets (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5676] schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5659] schemaComplete default value (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5658] restore accidental change to smlif:identityType (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5635] impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5505] wrong type for schemaBinding/namespaceBinding/namespace attribute (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5713] Minor wording issue in Appendix E (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5712] Missing word "global" in schema annotation. (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5711] Fuzzy phrase: "essentially the same". (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5710] Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.1 - mismatch of definitions (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5678] locid is missing from schema in editors draft (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5713] Minor wording issue in Appendix E (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5712] Missing word "global" in schema annotation. (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5711] Fuzzy phrase: "essentially the same". (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5710] Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.1 - mismatch of definitions (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ] (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5505] wrong type for schemaBinding/namespaceBinding/namespace attribute (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5676] schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5707] clarify SML reference resolution when sml:uri value is an empty string (Thursday, 22 May)
• [Bug 5678] locid is missing from schema in editors draft (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution (Tuesday, 20 May)
• [Bug 5492] xs:schema lines too long (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 5645] remove spurious ns1 binding from appendix A and reflow line (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 5645] remove spurious ns1 binding from appendix A and reflow line (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean? (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5562] SML should define an XHTML href Reference Scheme (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986 (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme' (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5529] Clarify Appendix C (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence? (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5505] wrong type for schemaBinding/namespaceBinding/namespace attribute (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme' (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean? (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5525] Confusing section names (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5658] restore accidental change to smlif:identityType (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5659] schemaComplete default value (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence? (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 5562] SML should define an XHTML href Reference Scheme (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 5678] locid is missing from schema in editors draft (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 5680] fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 5658] restore accidental change to smlif:identityType (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 5676] schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 5659] schemaComplete default value (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 5679] fix disparity between SML & SML-IF specs regarding SML ref targets (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 5635] impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 5635] impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 5680] fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 5679] fix disparity between SML & SML-IF specs regarding SML ref targets (Wednesday, 7 May)
• [Bug 5678] locid is missing from schema in editors draft (Wednesday, 7 May)
• [Bug 5678] locid is missing from schema in editors draft (Wednesday, 7 May)
• [Bug 5676] schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location (Saturday, 3 May)
• [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? (Thursday, 1 May)
• [Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" (Thursday, 1 May)
• [Bug 5390] How to handle non-embedded documents referenced by EPRs in SML-IF (Thursday, 1 May)
• [Bug 5561] SML should define a Simple XLink Reference Scheme (Thursday, 1 May)
• [Bug 5657] Define implementation-defined and -dependent, use consistently (Thursday, 1 May)
• [Bug 5656] Defining interoperability for user-defined reference schemes (Thursday, 1 May)
• [Bug 5653] Final vocabulary clean-up (Thursday, 1 May)
• [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined (Thursday, 1 May)
• [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear (Thursday, 1 May)
• [Bug 5544] Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element? (Thursday, 1 May)
• [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear (Thursday, 1 May)

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear (Saturday, 31 May)
• [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear (Saturday, 31 May)

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

• Re: [w3c sml][agenda][v2] 2008-05-01 SML Telecon (Thursday, 1 May)

John Arwe

• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-05-20 SML Telecon (Tuesday, 20 May)
• bugs in "surprising" (to me) states (Thursday, 15 May)
• RE: interoperability is... ? (was: SML interop test plan) (Wednesday, 7 May)
• Re: [w3c sml] [EPR Note] Response to Comment #9, Issue 5431 (Monday, 5 May)
• Re: [Bug 5676] schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location (Monday, 5 May)
• RE: SML interop test plan (Monday, 5 May)
• Re: discussion on : 5544 Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element? (Thursday, 1 May)
• Re: discussion on : 5544 Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element? (Thursday, 1 May)

Jordan Boucher

• Re: 5679 fix disparity between SML & SML-IF specs regarding SML ref targets (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: 5676 schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location (Thursday, 8 May)
• Re: 5658 restore accidental change to smlif:identityType (Thursday, 8 May)
• [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-05-01 SML Teleconference (Monday, 5 May)

Julia McCarthy

• regrets for 5/8 and 5/15 (Wednesday, 7 May)

Kumar Pandit

• 5676 schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location (Thursday, 8 May)
• 5679 fix disparity between SML & SML-IF specs regarding SML ref targets (Thursday, 8 May)
• 5659 schemaComplete default value (Thursday, 8 May)
• 5658 restore accidental change to smlif:identityType (Thursday, 8 May)
• discussion on : 5544 Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element? (Thursday, 1 May)
• support for shorthand (barename) pointers : summary of discussion at f2f (Thursday, 1 May)

Lynn, James (HP Software)

• [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-05-22 SML (Tuesday, 27 May)
• RE: [w3c sml] sml:ref and interoperability (Thursday, 22 May)

Pratul Dublish

• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-05-29 SML Telecon (Wednesday, 28 May)
• RE: [w3c sml][agenda] v2 2008-05-15 SML Telecon (Thursday, 15 May)
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-05-15 SML Telecon (Wednesday, 14 May)

Smith, Virginia (HP Software)

• [w3c sml] sml:ref and interoperability (Thursday, 22 May)
• [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-05-15 SML Teleconference (Friday, 16 May)
• RE: 5676 schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location (Thursday, 8 May)

Wilson, Kirk D

• RE: [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-05-15 SML Telecon (Wednesday, 14 May)
• RE: 5658 restore accidental change to smlif:identityType (Thursday, 8 May)
• RE: 5676 schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location (Thursday, 8 May)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 May 2008 04:16:08 UTC