public-rdfa-wg@w3.org from March 2012 by author

Alex Milowski

• Re: Browsing Test Cases on rdfa.info (Saturday, 17 March)
• Browsing Test Cases on rdfa.info (Saturday, 17 March)
• Typing of Literals in RDFa API (Tuesday, 6 March)
• RDFa 1.1 API Comments (Tuesday, 6 March)

Grant Robertson

• Re: Updated the primer (Saturday, 31 March)
• RDFa Subject-Object Variables Determination (Saturday, 31 March)
• Setting [typed resource] when {@rel | @rev} - RDFa Core 1.1, Section 7.5, Step 6 (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Some preliminaries and questions about lingo, etcetera. (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Some preliminaries and questions about lingo, etcetera. (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Some preliminaries and questions about lingo, etcetera. (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Introduction (Sunday, 25 March)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: do we need a test for that? (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: do we need a test for that? (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Some preliminaries and questions about lingo, etcetera. (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Error in RDFa Core 1.1 examples (Saturday, 24 March)
• any23 RDFa test suite results (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Adding test cases to the suite to cover ISSUE-131 (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Adding test cases to the suite to cover ISSUE-131 (Friday, 23 March)
• Updated EARL results (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: On test #286 Re: pyRdfa passes all the HTML5 tests again:-) (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: HTML5 support for <time> element. (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: HTML5 support for <time> element. (Monday, 19 March)
• HTML5 support for <time> element. (Sunday, 18 March)
• clj-rdfa passes all base RDFa 1.1 tests (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Browsing Test Cases on rdfa.info (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Additional test requirements (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Thursday, 15 March)
• Additional test requirements (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Preliminary EARL report (Wednesday, 14 March)
• JSON-LD dump of RDFa test manifest (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Test suite caching problem (Sunday, 11 March)
• Test suite caching problem (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Some changes on the test cases for HTML5 (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Subtle namespace difference with RDFa+HTML5 for XML Literals... (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Subtle namespace difference with RDFa+HTML5 for XML Literals... (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: test #236 and HTML5 (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: HTML5 test cases and the lang attributes (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: test #236 and HTML5 (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: RDFa Test Suite EARL reports (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? update of tests (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? update of tests (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: RDFa Test Suite EARL reports (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Fwd: RDFa Test Suite EARL reports (Monday, 5 March)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-132 from RDF Web Apps WG (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-130 from RDF Web Apps WG (Thursday, 15 March)

Ivan Herman

• Re: Updated the primer (Saturday, 31 March)
• Re: do we need a test for that? (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: do we need a test for that? (Wednesday, 28 March)
• do we need a test for that? (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Updated the primer (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Updated the primer (Wednesday, 28 March)
• Re: Some preliminaries and questions about lingo, etcetera. (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: any23 RDFa test suite results (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Error in RDFa Core 1.1 examples (Sunday, 25 March)
• Fwd: Error in RDFa Core 1.1 examples (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Getting Started w/ RDFa (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Adding test cases to the suite to cover ISSUE-131 (Friday, 23 March)
• Made a thorough update on the RDFa primer... (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Updated EARL results (Tuesday, 20 March)
• On test #286 Re: pyRdfa passes all the HTML5 tests again:-) (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: HTML5 support for <time> element. (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: HTML5 support for <time> element. (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: clj-rdfa passes all base RDFa 1.1 tests (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re 2: Preliminary EARL report (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Additional test requirements (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Additional test requirements (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Wednesday, 14 March)
• CR has been published... (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re 2: Should @datetime generate a plain literal with language? (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Should @datetime generate a plain literal with language? (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Test suite caching problem (Sunday, 11 March)
• Some changes on the test cases for HTML5 (Saturday, 10 March)
• Re: Subtle namespace difference with RDFa+HTML5 for XML Literals... (Saturday, 10 March)
• Re: Subtle namespace difference with RDFa+HTML5 for XML Literals... (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: HTML5 test cases and the lang attributes (Friday, 9 March)
• 'license' term? (Friday, 9 March)
• Subtle namespace difference with RDFa+HTML5 for XML Literals... (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Test #113 with HTML5 (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: test #236 and HTML5 (Friday, 9 March)
• Test #113 with HTML5 (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: HTML5 test cases and the lang attributes (Friday, 9 March)
• HTML5 test cases and the lang attributes (Friday, 9 March)
• test #236 and HTML5 (Friday, 9 March)
• A temporary issue with the test harness (Thursday, 8 March)
• Updated some tests... (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? ISSUE-133 (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? update of tests (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? update of tests (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Re: Similar issue with another test Re: Error in test or error in spec? (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Similar issue with another test Re: Error in test or error in spec? (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Error in test or error in spec? (Wednesday, 7 March)

Manu Sporny

• Telecon next week... (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Introduction (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Browsing Test Cases on rdfa.info (Saturday, 17 March)
• RDFa Telecons during CR Phase (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Wednesday, 14 March)
• New Heartbeat WD for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-121 from RDF Web Apps WG (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-128 from RDF Web Apps WG (Monday, 5 March)

Michael[tm] Smith

• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-128 from RDF Web Apps WG (Monday, 5 March)

Niklas Lindström

• Re: Adding test cases to the suite to cover ISSUE-131 (Friday, 23 March)
• Adding test cases to the suite to cover ISSUE-131 (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: clj-rdfa passes all base RDFa 1.1 tests (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Preliminary EARL report (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Subtle namespace difference with RDFa+HTML5 for XML Literals... (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: RDFa Test Suite EARL reports (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Updated some tests... (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? (Wednesday, 7 March)

RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-133 (about, typeof, and property): Processing step missing when @property, @typeof, and @about are on the same element [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments] (Thursday, 8 March)

Shane McCarron

• Re: Fwd: Error in RDFa Core 1.1 examples (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Fwd: Error in RDFa Core 1.1 examples (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Updated some tests... (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? (Thursday, 8 March)

Steven Pemberton

• Re: Telecon Agenda - March 1st 2012, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 1 March)

Stéphane Corlosquet

• Should @datetime generate a plain literal with language? (Sunday, 11 March)
• Re: Updated RDFa Lite 1.1 draft (Thursday, 1 March)

Ted Thibodeau Jr

• Re: Telecon Agenda - March 1st 2012, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 1 March)

Will Clark

• Getting Started w/ RDFa (Wednesday, 21 March)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 March 2012 17:31:29 UTC