public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from April 2005 by thread

SPARQL itself represented in RDF instead of DML Gustavo Frederico (Saturday, 23 April)

ANN: New working draft: SPARQL Query Language for RDF Seaborne, Andy (Friday, 22 April)

Limit option suggestion Peter Wilson (Thursday, 21 April)

User defined operations and PREMISES keyword Stephane Fellah (Wednesday, 20 April)

Re: Named- and background graphs, triples vs quads, trust, etc. Dan Connolly (Thursday, 14 April)

replies on named graphs? containers use case Giovanni Tummarello (Thursday, 14 April)

• Re: replies on named graphs? containers use case Bob MacGregor (Thursday, 14 April)
  • Re: replies on named graphs? containers use case Giovanni Tummarello (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: replies on named graphs? containers use case Dan Connolly (Friday, 15 April)
  • Re: replies on named graphs? containers use case Arjohn Kampman (Friday, 15 April)
    • Re: replies on named graphs? containers use case Giovanni Tummarello (Friday, 15 April)

Some possible enhancements Peter Wilson (Monday, 11 April)

• Re: Some possible enhancements Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 12 April)

NumericalLogical syntax seems strange Graham Klyne (Monday, 11 April)

From and With Peter Wilson (Saturday, 9 April)

• Re: From and With Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 12 April)

More on WITH and FROM clauses Graham Klyne (Friday, 8 April)

• Re: More on WITH and FROM clauses (fromUnionQuery) Dan Connolly (Friday, 8 April)

Reification shorthand (please drop it) Graham Klyne (Friday, 8 April)

LIMIT clause in right place? Graham Klyne (Friday, 8 April)

WHERE clause optional? Graham Klyne (Friday, 8 April)

• Re: WHERE clause optional? Dave Beckett (Friday, 8 April)
  • Re: WHERE clause optional? Graham Klyne (Friday, 8 April)
    • Re: WHERE clause optional? Dave Beckett (Friday, 8 April)

More comments about CONSTRUCT Graham Klyne (Friday, 8 April)

CONSTRUCT *, optionals and alternatives Graham Klyne (Friday, 8 April)

Comments on SPARQL 17-Feb-2005 draft Graham Klyne (Friday, 8 April)

• Re: Comments on SPARQL 17-Feb-2005 draft (SOURCE, Multiple-graph queries) Dan Connolly (Friday, 8 April)
  • Re: Comments on SPARQL 17-Feb-2005 draft (SOURCE, Multiple-graph queries) Graham Klyne (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: Comments on SPARQL 17-Feb-2005 draft (DESCRIBE) Dan Connolly (Friday, 8 April)
  • Re: Comments on SPARQL 17-Feb-2005 draft (DESCRIBE) Graham Klyne (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: Comments on SPARQL 17-Feb-2005 draft (valueTesting, serviceDescription) Dan Connolly (Friday, 8 April)

Comment on SPARQL query language spec (nit) Graham Klyne (Wednesday, 6 April)

• Re: Comment on SPARQL query language spec (punctuationSyntax) Dan Connolly (Thursday, 7 April)

SPARQL query by reference in HTTP GET Graham Klyne (Tuesday, 5 April)

Re: SPARQL: which features now, which features later for RDF Data Access? Adrian Walker (Tuesday, 5 April)

• Re: SPARQL: which features now, which features later for RDF Data Access? Dan Connolly (Thursday, 7 April)

Re: SPARQL: which features now, which features later for RDF Data Access? Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 April)

• Re: SPARQL: which features now, which features later for RDF Data Access? Dan Connolly (Monday, 4 April)
  • Re: SPARQL: which features now, which features later for RDF Data Access? Patrick Stickler (Monday, 4 April)

Comments on pattern solution definition Geoff Chappell (Saturday, 2 April)

• RE: Comments on pattern solution definition Geoff Chappell (Saturday, 2 April)

Last message date: Saturday, 23 April 2005 13:43:54 UTC