Re: Comment on SPARQL query language spec (punctuationSyntax)

> I'm working on a SPARQL implementation, based on:
>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050217/
> and offer some comments:
[...]
> I note the punctuation decision referenced:
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf4.html#item18
> and offer an opinion that I would prefer the N3/Turtle approach, partly on 
> the basis that I already have code to deal with these structures.

In fact, the WG has reconsidered that decision since the 17 Feb
publication. I hope we'll have an updated WD in the next 2 to
three weeks. Meanwhile, you're welcome to peek into the WG
proceedings. The relevant issue is...

  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#punctuationSyntax


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 14:31:31 UTC