- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:54:56 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
It was on my longer list of more detailed comments to suggest that reification shorthand was unnecessary [1] and probably undesirable [2]. Since I note it's being discussed by the WG, I hereby add my voice to the debate. #g -- [1] One can still use the explicit form with rdf:subject, rdf:predicate, rdf:object, etc., if this is *really* needed. [2] More implementation burden with dubious or negative value. ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Friday, 8 April 2005 16:11:28 UTC