W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > April 2005

Reification shorthand (please drop it)

From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:54:56 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org

It was on my longer list of more detailed comments to suggest that 
reification shorthand was unnecessary [1] and probably undesirable 
[2].  Since I note it's being discussed by the WG, I hereby add my voice to 
the debate.


[1] One can still use the explicit form with rdf:subject, 
rdf:predicate,  rdf:object, etc., if this is *really* needed.

[2] More implementation burden with dubious or negative value.

Graham Klyne
For email:
Received on Friday, 8 April 2005 16:11:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:06 UTC