public-rdf-comments@w3.org from September 2013 by author

David Booth

• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (Thursday, 12 September)
• [RESOLVED] Re: ISSUE-139 Resolution (Thursday, 5 September)

David Wood

• Re: references and acknowledgements …. (trumpet blowing) (Wednesday, 11 September)
• ISSUE-140 Resolution (Wednesday, 4 September)
• ISSUE-139 Resolution (Wednesday, 4 September)

Dr. A. Joseph Rockmore

• reified statements in Turtle (Tuesday, 17 September)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: TriG test suite issues (Saturday, 21 September)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: TriG test suite issues (Tuesday, 24 September)

Gregg Reynolds

• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (Tuesday, 10 September)

Gregory Williams

• Re: TriG test suite issues (Tuesday, 24 September)
• TriG test suite issues (Friday, 20 September)

Ivan Herman

• Re: Regarding 6. Fragment Identifiers in http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-rdf11-concepts-20130723/#section-fragID (tracker, this is on ISSUE-141) (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: Regarding 6. Fragment Identifiers in http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-rdf11-concepts-20130723/#section-fragID (tracker, this is on ISSUE-141) (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: ISSUE-140 Resolution (Thursday, 5 September)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: references and acknowledgements …. (trumpet blowing) (Wednesday, 11 September)
• references and acknowledgements …. (trumpet blowing) (Friday, 6 September)

Jeremy J Carroll

• Re: nanopublications are they ok with RDF graphs? (Tuesday, 24 September)
• Addendum: Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (Tuesday, 17 September)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (Monday, 9 September)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (Monday, 9 September)
• comment on rdf semantics (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (Friday, 6 September)

Pat Hayes

• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (Tuesday, 10 September)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (Monday, 9 September)

Paul Groth

• nanopublications are they ok with RDF graphs? (Sunday, 22 September)

Paul Tyson

• N-Triples LC WD typos (Monday, 30 September)

Richard Cyganiak

• Re: Regarding the SHOULD for NFC in RDF Literals (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: references and acknowledgements …. (trumpet blowing) (Monday, 9 September)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (Saturday, 7 September)
• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Tuesday, 3 September)

Sebastian Hellmann

• Re: Regarding the SHOULD for NFC in RDF Literals (Monday, 23 September)
• Regarding the SHOULD for NFC in RDF Literals (Sunday, 22 September)
• Re: Regarding 6. Fragment Identifiers in http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-rdf11-concepts-20130723/#section-fragID (tracker, this is on ISSUE-141) (Thursday, 12 September)

Stian Soiland-Reyes

• Re: Regarding the SHOULD for NFC in RDF Literals (Monday, 23 September)

Last message date: Monday, 30 September 2013 13:22:06 UTC