W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > September 2013

Re: references and acknowledgements . (trumpet blowing)

From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 08:37:03 -0400
Cc: "public-rdf-comments@w3.org Comments" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-Id: <8CE9FDC4-F7E7-4E15-A7DB-CCCF6F5C7C85@3roundstones.com>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc1729@gmail.com>
Hi Jeremy,

The lack of acknowledgements in the currently published Concepts is a ReSpec issue and does not reflect any intention of the WG.  We will sort it.  Thank you for bringing it to our attention.

Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood



On Sep 6, 2013, at 16:16, Jeremy Carroll <jjc1729@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> This is a comment on the current last call documents (concepts and semantics)
> 
> I note that there is no mention of Brian McBride's role in the previous round of specifications 
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020617-f2f/
> "The WG decided that bwm will be "series editor" for the WG documents."
> 
> - obviously Brian is no longer fulfilling this role, but it is conventional to maintain some reference to former editors in the acknowledgements or somewhere.
> 
> I also note that Graham and I are not called out as former editors in the Concepts acknowledgements, in particular, the sentence: "The RDF 2004 editors acknowledge " fails to mention who those editors were!
> 
> I am also slightly disappointed that there is no informative reference to Named Graphs, Provenance and Trust by Carroll, Bizer, Hayes & Stickler; with this I realize that the bar is much higher than with acknowledgements to former editors so my disappointment is lower!
> 
> Overall though I believe the documents may benefit from a review of the acknowledgements section by some member of the WG.
> 
> Jeremy
> 




Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 12:37:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 September 2013 12:37:27 UTC