- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc1729@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:32:30 -0700
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: "public-rdf-comments@w3.org Comments" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <ADADDE31-D32E-4828-8E63-4D427E6A6BEA@gmail.com>
Thank you, that addresses my comment (if not my disappointment) Jeremy On Sep 11, 2013, at 5:37 AM, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > The lack of acknowledgements in the currently published Concepts is a ReSpec issue and does not reflect any intention of the WG. We will sort it. Thank you for bringing it to our attention. > > Regards, > Dave > -- > http://about.me/david_wood > > > > On Sep 6, 2013, at 16:16, Jeremy Carroll <jjc1729@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> This is a comment on the current last call documents (concepts and semantics) >> >> I note that there is no mention of Brian McBride's role in the previous round of specifications … >> >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020617-f2f/ >> "The WG decided that bwm will be "series editor" for the WG documents." >> >> - obviously Brian is no longer fulfilling this role, but it is conventional to maintain some reference to former editors in the acknowledgements or somewhere. >> >> I also note that Graham and I are not called out as former editors in the Concepts acknowledgements, in particular, the sentence: "The RDF 2004 editors acknowledge …" fails to mention who those editors were! >> >> I am also slightly disappointed that there is no informative reference to Named Graphs, Provenance and Trust by Carroll, Bizer, Hayes & Stickler; with this I realize that the bar is much higher than with acknowledgements to former editors so my disappointment is lower! >> >> Overall though I believe the documents may benefit from a review of the acknowledgements section by some member of the WG. >> >> Jeremy >> >
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 22:33:00 UTC