public-ortc@w3.org from April 2014 by author

Adam Bergkvist

• Re: camelCase for event listeners (Thursday, 10 April)

Bernard Aboba

• Issue 60: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction (and also improve WebRTC 1.0 compatibility) (Friday, 25 April)
• Issue 60: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction (and also improve WebRTC 1.0 compatibility) (Friday, 25 April)
• Issue #26: Error handling (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Thursday, 24 April)
• RE: Issue 64: Section 2.5.1 Fingerprint attribute (Wednesday, 23 April)
• RE: Separate proposal on layering/simulcast (was part of the "big proposal") (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Issue #65: Section 8.4: RTCRtpFeatures (Tuesday, 22 April)
• RE: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Tuesday, 22 April)
• RE: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: Separate proposal on layering/simulcast (was part of the "big proposal") (Saturday, 19 April)
• RE: tcpType parameter (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Issue 64: Section 2.5.1 Fingerprint attribute (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: tcpType parameter (Friday, 18 April)
• ICE use cases (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Issue 64: Section 2.5.1 Fingerprint attribute (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Separate proposal on layering/simulcast (was part of the "big proposal") (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Issue 58: RTCIceListener Example 6 (Section 4.4) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [ortc] Ability to set priority field in RTCIceCandidate? (#42) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [ortc] Undefined RTCRtpListener behavior (#48) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [ortc] Undefined RTCRtpListener behavior (#48) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [ortc] Ability to set priority field in RTCIceCandidate? (#42) (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: Flushing ICE candidates (Saturday, 12 April)
• Re: Delivering ICE candidates as packages of "available now" candidates in signaling (Saturday, 12 April)
• Re: Latest editor's draft (Saturday, 12 April)
• Issue #47: ICE candidate gathering policy (Thursday, 10 April)
• Current ORTC API Issues list (Wednesday, 9 April)
• RE: camelCase for event listeners (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Issue 44: onlocalcandidate issues (Saturday, 5 April)
• Re: active speaker information in mixed streams (Thursday, 3 April)
• Issue 43: WebIDL Section 3.2.2: "sequence" as an attribute prohibited (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Issue 42: Ability to set priority field in RTCIceCandidate? (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Issue 42: Ability to set priority field in RTCIceCandidate? (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Issue 41: Support for ICE-TCP (RFC 6544) (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Issue #40: RTCRtpDtlsTransportState (Wednesday, 2 April)
• Re: Issue #39: What happens when X is omitted from dictionary Y (Tuesday, 1 April)

Chris Wendt

• Re: Separate proposal on quality (was part of the "big proposal") (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Separate proposal on quality (was part of the "big proposal") (Thursday, 17 April)

cowwoc

• Re: Using Factory Method Pattern vs Constructor pattern (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: camelCase for event listeners (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: camelCase for event listeners (Wednesday, 9 April)
• camelCase for event listeners (Monday, 7 April)

Emil Ivov

• Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC. (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC. (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC. (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC. (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC. (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC. (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC. (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: ice restart ? (Saturday, 26 April)
• Re: ice restart ? (Saturday, 26 April)
• Re: RTCSession object (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: RTCSession object (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: [ortc] Undefined RTCRtpListener behavior (#48) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [ortc] Undefined RTCRtpListener behavior (#48) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: Delivering ICE candidates as packages of "available now" candidates in signaling (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: Delivering ICE candidates as packages of "available now" candidates in signaling (Saturday, 12 April)
• Re: active speaker information in mixed streams (Monday, 7 April)

Erik Lagerway

• ORTC Editor's Draft Update (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: ORTC CG Meeting - Update (Monday, 14 April)
• ORTC CG Meeting - Update (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Latest editor's draft (Saturday, 12 April)
• Next CG Meeting - April 17, 2014 (Tuesday, 8 April)

Justin Uberti

• Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: Issue 64: Section 2.5.1 Fingerprint attribute (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: Issue 64: Section 2.5.1 Fingerprint attribute (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: tcpType parameter (Friday, 18 April)
• Actions from CG meeting (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: [ortc] Undefined RTCRtpListener behavior (#48) (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: TCP active/passive/actpass/holdconn (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Using Factory Method Pattern vs Constructor pattern (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Issue 41: Support for ICE-TCP (RFC 6544) (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Issue #40: RTCRtpDtlsTransportState (Thursday, 17 April)

Martin Thomson

• Re: [ortc] Undefined RTCRtpListener behavior (#48) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [ortc] Undefined RTCRtpListener behavior (#48) (Monday, 14 April)

Mary Barnes

• Re: camelCase for event listeners (Friday, 11 April)

Peter Thatcher

• Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC. (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC. (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC. (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC. (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC. (Wednesday, 30 April)
• I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC. (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: ice restart ? (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: data channel send flow control? (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: ice restart ? (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: RTCSession object (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: Separate proposal on layering/simulcast (was part of the "big proposal") (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: Separate proposal on quality (was part of the "big proposal") (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Separate proposal on layering/simulcast (was part of the "big proposal") (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Separate proposal on quality (was part of the "big proposal") (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Separate proposal on layering/simulcast (was part of the "big proposal") (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Splitting up the "Big Proposal" on layering and quality into separate proposals: layering and quality (Tuesday, 15 April)
• A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Tuesday, 15 April)

Robin Raymond

• Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC. (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC. (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: I think we need a way to configure the RTCP SSRC. (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Re: ice restart ? (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: ice restart ? (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: data channel send flow control? (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: ice restart ? (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: ice restart ? (Saturday, 26 April)
• Re: ice restart ? (Saturday, 26 April)
• Re: ICE use cases (Saturday, 26 April)
• ice restart ? (Saturday, 26 April)
• Re: RTCRtpCapabilities "features" ? (Saturday, 26 April)
• Re: RTCSession object (Friday, 25 April)
• RTCSession object (Friday, 25 April)
• headerExtensions of type sequence<DOMString> (Friday, 25 April)
• RTCRtpCapabilities "features" ? (Friday, 25 April)
• data channel send flow control? (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: A small proposal to cleanup DataChannel construction. (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: Issue 64: Section 2.5.1 Fingerprint attribute (Tuesday, 22 April)
• TCP active/passive/actpass/holdconn (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [ortc] Undefined RTCRtpListener behavior (#48) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [ortc] Ability to set priority field in RTCIceCandidate? (#42) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components (Sunday, 13 April)
• RtcRtpReceiver matching rules for payload, SSRC and receiverId (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components (Sunday, 13 April)
• ICE candidate search freezing and reuse of usernameFrag/password for components (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: Using Factory Method Pattern vs Constructor pattern (Saturday, 12 April)
• Re: Delivering ICE candidates as packages of "available now" candidates in signaling (Saturday, 12 April)
• ICE Gather and Warmth policies (Saturday, 12 April)
• Re: Flushing ICE candidates (Saturday, 12 April)
• Flushing ICE candidates (Saturday, 12 April)
• Re: Delivering ICE candidates as packages of "available now" candidates in signaling (Saturday, 12 April)
• Delivering ICE candidates as packages of "available now" candidates in signaling (Saturday, 12 April)
• Latest editor's draft (Saturday, 12 April)
• Using Factory Method Pattern vs Constructor pattern (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: camelCase for event listeners (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: camelCase for event listeners (Wednesday, 9 April)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 April 2014 16:34:04 UTC