public-hydra@w3.org from March 2014 by author

Dan Brickley

• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Thursday, 27 March)

David Booth

• Re: Inference for error checking [was Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships] (Monday, 31 March)
• Inference for error checking [was Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships] (Monday, 31 March)

Eric Moritz

• Representing HTTP forms in Hydra (Monday, 31 March)

Gannon Dick

• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Friday, 28 March)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (ISSUE-41) (was: hydra:Link) (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (ISSUE-41) (was: hydra:Link) (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: hydra:Link (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: hydra:Link (ISSUE-41) (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: hydra:Link (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Hydra use case: Linked Data Fragments (ISSUE-30) (Tuesday, 18 March)
• reverse properties (Saturday, 15 March)
• hydra:Link (Saturday, 15 March)
• Re: Hydra use case: Linked Data Fragments (ISSUE-30) (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) (Monday, 10 March)

Jason Douglas

• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Saturday, 29 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 24 March)
• RE: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Friday, 7 March)

john.walker

• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Thursday, 27 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Thursday, 27 March)
• RE: Getting started with Hydra (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Getting started with Hydra (Sunday, 16 March)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: hydra:Link (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: Hydra use case: Linked Data Fragments (Tuesday, 11 March)

Mark Baker

• Re: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) (Monday, 3 March)

Markus Lanthaler

• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Sunday, 30 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Saturday, 29 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Saturday, 29 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Saturday, 29 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Saturday, 29 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Saturday, 29 March)
• Anyone in Amsterdam the next couple of days? (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (ISSUE-41) (was: hydra:Link) (Monday, 24 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 24 March)
• RE: First Draft of Hydra Core Vocabulary published by Hydra Community Group [via Hydra Community Group] (Monday, 24 March)
• How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 24 March)
• How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (ISSUE-41) (was: hydra:Link) (Monday, 24 March)
• RE: hydra:Link (ISSUE-41) (Friday, 21 March)
• RE: hydra:Link (ISSUE-41) (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Hydra use case: Linked Data Fragments (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Getting started with Hydra (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Hydra use case: Linked Data Fragments (ISSUE-30) (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: hydra:Link (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Getting started with Hydra (Monday, 17 March)
• RE: Hydra use case: Linked Data Fragments (ISSUE-30) (Monday, 17 March)
• RE: Hydra use case: Linked Data Fragments (ISSUE-30) (Monday, 17 March)
• RE: reverse properties (ISSUE-40, ISSUE-1) (Monday, 17 March)
• RE: Hydra use case: Linked Data Fragments (ISSUE-30) (Friday, 14 March)
• RE: Hydra use case: Linked Data Fragments (ISSUE-30) (Friday, 14 March)
• RE: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) (Monday, 10 March)
• RE: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) (Monday, 10 March)
• RE: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) (Monday, 10 March)
• RE: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) (Monday, 10 March)
• RE: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) (Friday, 7 March)
• RE: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Friday, 7 March)
• RE: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Friday, 7 March)
• RE: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Friday, 7 March)
• RE: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Friday, 7 March)
• RE: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 5 March)
• RE: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• RE: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Wednesday, 5 March)
• RE: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• RE: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Tuesday, 4 March)
• RE: StatusCodeDescription vs. Status (ISSUE-32) (Tuesday, 4 March)
• RE: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Monday, 3 March)
• RE: Nested structures / ISSUE-26 (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Monday, 3 March)
• RE: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Monday, 3 March)
• RE: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Monday, 3 March)
• RE: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal (Monday, 3 March)
• RE: StatusCodeDescription vs. Status (ISSUE-32) (Monday, 3 March)
• RE: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) (Monday, 3 March)
• RE: StatusCodeDescription vs. Status (ISSUE-32) (Monday, 3 March)
• RE: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (was: More Thoughts on Links and Operation Subclasses) (Monday, 3 March)
• RE: removing hydra:search (Monday, 3 March)

Martynas Jusevičius

• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)

mike amundsen

• Re: Anyone in Amsterdam the next couple of days? (Tuesday, 25 March)

Niklas Lindström

• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)

Pat Hayes

• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: Inference for error checking [was Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships] (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Sunday, 30 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)

Ruben Verborgh

• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: Hydra use case: Linked Data Fragments (ISSUE-30) (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Hydra use case: Linked Data Fragments (ISSUE-30) (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: Hydra use case: Linked Data Fragments (ISSUE-30) (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Hydra use case: Linked Data Fragments (ISSUE-30) (Friday, 14 March)
• Hydra use case: Linked Data Fragments (Tuesday, 11 March)
• Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) (Monday, 10 March)
• Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: StatusCodeDescription vs. Status (ISSUE-32) (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: StatusCodeDescription vs. Status (ISSUE-32) (Monday, 3 March)

Ryan J. McDonough

• Re: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: ISSUE-31: Are Operations violating REST's uniform interface constraint? (Tuesday, 4 March)

Sam Goto

• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Monday, 31 March)
• Re: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: ActionHandlers vs "App resources" (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: Nested structures / ISSUE-26 (was: An updated draft of the schema.org/Action proposal) (Monday, 3 March)

Thad Guidry

• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Friday, 28 March)

Thomas Hoppe

• Re: Define/change the range of "supportedProperties" (ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: StatusCodeDescription vs. Status (ISSUE-32) (Monday, 3 March)

Vuk Milicic

• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Tuesday, 25 March)

W3C Team

• First Draft of Hydra Core Vocabulary published by Hydra Community Group [via Hydra Community Group] (Monday, 24 March)

エリクソン　トーレ

• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Thursday, 27 March)
• RE: How to avoid that collections "break" relationships (Wednesday, 26 March)

Last message date: Monday, 31 March 2014 21:10:45 UTC