- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:59:59 +0100
- To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
On Friday, March 14, 2014 8:03 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > Not a fan of using <> around URIs. Neither am I > I'd say that the general practice > would be that values are either (URI-encoded) URIs, or quoted strings, > with optional language using a Turtle-like syntax. I don't see any real > advantage of including datatype information, though. Hmm... that depends on how you've modeled your data, right? If, e.g., you would be using datatypes to mark up the currency of a price it would be pretty important. > Alternatively, language could be another parameter > (subject=&predicate=&object=&language=). I'm not convinced about splitting a value into two parameters and it becomes really messy when you have multiple. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Monday, 17 March 2014 21:00:30 UTC