31 March 2011 Agenda =======================================
Re: Title that may confuse the reader
Re: SM6, SM7: SC 1.2.5
Re: last line of test redundant
Re: Table of Content needs summary of collections
Re: I think there is a failure missing
Re: wrong success criteria association
Re: Techniques for WCAG 2.0: T3: Using standard text formatting conventions for headings (TXT)
Re: Check for CSS seems less useful than test for use of deprecated elements (e.g., font, center, strike, i, b, u)
Re: Test contradicts other options to meet SC 1.4.4
Re: Test for percent is in itself not meaningful, should encompass %, em, font size names
Re: H89: certainly cannot be a sufficient technique
Re: use of fieldset should not be required for any group of logically related input elements
Re: Test whether all th Elements have scope attribute misleading
Re: Equivalence of content of noembed element not explicitly checked
Re: The test for the correct use of longdesc should be conditional on its application
Re: Test does not check top position of link or mechanism
Re: The test should include a check whether the function to turn off blinking content is documented
Re: Requirement for 200% text increase nearly impossilbe to meet in most cases
Re: Test needs specification of window size and criteria for compliance
Re: Missing explicit requirement that styleswitcher be positioned at the top of the page
Re: Test does not cover appropriateness of audio description
Re: either/or test seems incorrect: #2 must be true
Re: Test in G68 does not seem to fit
Re: Reword G1 'Description' and 'Note'. (This will make "Skip to Main" as a permanent visible link)
Re: F61: 24 hours?
Re: SM7: Expected Results
Re: SCR19 applies to SC 3.2.2 too
Re: G150: procedure and policy
Re: G97: Only "immediately following the expanded form"?
Re: G93: SC 1.2.4
Re: H82 missing?
Re: (None currently documented) stands at the beginning of examples, although examples are available
Re: None currently documented should not be there
Re: no link to single file from http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/Overview.html
Re: techniques link to 20081211 version
Re: Note at end of sufficient techniques for 3.3.2 is ambiguous
Re: Understanding WCAG 2- SC 2.4.3
Re: I feel that the 2 sufficient techniques should be 'and' not 'or'.
- RE: I feel that the 2 sufficient techniques should be 'and' not 'or'.
- Re: I feel that the 2 sufficient techniques should be 'and' not 'or'.