Re: The second part of the description

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:59 AM, <noreply@w3.org> wrote:

>
> Name: Devarshi Pant
> Email: devarshipant@gmail.com
> Affiliation:
> Document: TD
> Item Number: F38
> Part of Item: Description
> Comment Type: editorial
> Summary of Issue: The second part of the description
> Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
> I am not clear about the use of the word, "proved" in the description, "The
> alt attribute must be proved and have a null value (i.e., alt="" or alt=" ")
> to avoid a failure of this Success Criterion."
>
>
>
> Proposed Change:
> 1st suggestion:
> "The alt attribute must be used and have a null value (i.e., alt="" or
> alt=" ") to avoid a failure of this Success Criterion."
> 2nd suggestion:
> "The alt attribute must be provided and have a null value (i.e., alt="" or
> alt=" ") to avoid a failure of this Success Criterion."
>
>
>
> ================================
Response from the Working Group
================================
Thank you for catching this. We will change "proved" to "provided".

Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact


On behalf of the WCAG Working Group