public-appformats@w3.org from September 2007 by thread

[access-control] Publish a new draft? Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 27 September)

Fwd: ISSUE-3: AC: does the AC syntax need to align with POWDER WG? Arthur Barstow (Monday, 24 September)

RE: ISSUE-12: Widgets: Digital signatures: XML Signature versus PKCS#7 [Web Application Packaging] olli.immonen@nokia.com (Friday, 21 September)

[access-control] Referer-Root HTTP header Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 20 September)

Fwd: Re: ISSUE-3: AC: does the AC syntax need to align with POWDER WG? Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 20 September)

Re: Request for Comments on Enabling Read Access for Web Resources Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 20 September)

Re: ISSUE-6: AC: should the spec support the HTTP OPTIONS method? Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 20 September)

Re: ISSUE-5: AC: should the deny rule be removed? Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 20 September)

Re: ISSUE-4: AC: does the spec need to differentiate a resource from a _representation_ of a resource? Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 20 September)

ISSUE-17 (JonF): Widgets: should Automatic Updates be included in v1.0? [Web Application Packaging] Web Application Formats Working Group Issue Tracker (Tuesday, 18 September)

Minutes from WAF WG's August 7-9 f2f meeting Arthur Barstow (Thursday, 6 September)

Re: [Widgets 1.0] Automatic Updates (1.0)? Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 6 September)

[ ACTION-107] Updating version list identifier algorithm Arve Bersvendsen (Wednesday, 5 September)

ISSUE-16 (ArtB): AC: Add some rationale to the Introduction [Access Control] Web Application Formats Working Group Issue Tracker (Tuesday, 4 September)

Re: widget namespace Marcos Caceres (Monday, 3 September)

Re: Heads-up: Some buzz about access-control Jon Ferraiolo (Saturday, 1 September)

Last message date: Thursday, 27 September 2007 19:55:52 UTC