W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > September 2007

Re: [ ACTION-107] Updating version list identifier algorithm

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:30:34 -0400
Message-ID: <e9dffd640709181930r2733bed1m6e53a40ea642b145@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Marcos Caceres" <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Arve Bersvendsen" <arveb@opera.com>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-appformats@w3.org

On 9/18/07, Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In any case, I would recommend not parsing versons at all. Just treat them
> > as opaque strings, and assume that there is an upgrade if the version on
> > the server doesn't match the version in the client.
>
> I could live with this, but it still makes me uncomfortable. What
> happens if I accidentally override a new version with an old version
> by mistake and don't realize it for a few days?

Don't do that!  What happens if you mislabel 1.7 as 1.6?

Stick with etags.  They work, and the tooling support is already
pretty good.  No need to have a widget-specific mechanism when a
generic one gets the job done.

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.         http://www.markbaker.ca
Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies  http://www.coactus.com
Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2007 02:30:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:22 GMT