W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > September 2007

Re: ISSUE-6: AC: should the spec support the HTTP OPTIONS method?

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 07:11:02 -0400
Message-Id: <635ECF45-70C6-44D9-A38D-79C689EED672@nokia.com>
Cc: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>

Yves, in case you are not subscribed to the WAF WG's mail list,  
please see Anne's response below regarding your 2 July comment about  
the Enabling Read Access for Web Resources document.

Regards, AB

On Sep 20, 2007, at 9:29 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:

>
> On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:11:58 +0200, Web Application Formats Issue  
> Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org> wrote:
>> ISSUE-6: AC: should the spec support the HTTP OPTIONS method?
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/waf/issues/6
>>
>> Raised by:  Everyone
>> On product: Access Control
>>
>> See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2007Jul/ 
>> 0001.html
>
> In case this wasn't forwarded to the public list yet I'll mention  
> it again. Only GET requests are supported. For any other method  
> additional safety precautions have to be taken. These are currently  
> outlined (although not very clear yet, I suppose) in http:// 
> dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/Overview.html#access1
>
>
> -- 
> Anne van Kesteren
> <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
> <http://www.opera.com/>
>
Received on Monday, 24 September 2007 11:11:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:22 GMT