xml-dist-app@w3.org from December 2005 by author

Anish Karmarkar

• Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Re: Resolution of issue Rec39 (Tuesday, 20 December)
• Resolution of issue Rec39 (Wednesday, 14 December)
• WS-Addr requirement for XMLP and issue 39rec (Wednesday, 7 December)

Damitha Kumarage

• Axis2C Milestone Release M0.2 Released (Thursday, 8 December)

David Hull

• Re: What it means to "get rid of MEPs" (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] (Wednesday, 14 December)
• [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] (Wednesday, 14 December)
• EPRs, MAPs and MEPs (Thursday, 1 December)

Eran Chinthaka

• [ANN] [Axis2] Axis2 0.93 Released (Friday, 2 December)

Francisco Curbera

• Re: What it means to "get rid of MEPs" (Saturday, 24 December)

Glen Daniels

• RE: Response envelope optional vs. response optional (Wednesday, 14 December)

Karen

• Staff placement (Thursday, 8 December)

Mark Baker

• Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: Concern about status code 303 and resolution to Rec33 (Wednesday, 7 December)

michael.mahan@nokia.com

• Test collection issues (Sunday, 11 December)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• Re: What it means to "get rid of MEPs" (Friday, 23 December)
• Re: Jabber Binding Supports Request/Response - existence proof of shared MEPs (Thursday, 22 December)
• Jabber Binding Supports Request/Response - existence proof of shared MEPs (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional (Thursday, 22 December)
• Re: What it means to "get rid of MEPs" (Thursday, 22 December)
• What it means to "get rid of MEPs" (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Resolution of issue Rec39 (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: [Fwd: Toward more fully-formed options] (Wednesday, 21 December)
• Re: Resolution of issue Rec39 (Thursday, 15 December)
• Response envelope optional vs. response optional (Wednesday, 14 December)
• Re: Concern about status code 303 and resolution to Rec33 (Wednesday, 7 December)

Peter Saint-Andre

• Re: Jabber Binding Supports Request/Response - existence proof of shared MEPs (Thursday, 22 December)
• [Fwd: [Standards-JIG] DRAFT: JEP-0072 (SOAP Over XMPP)] (Wednesday, 14 December)

Rich Salz

• Re: What it means to "get rid of MEPs" (Tuesday, 27 December)
• Re: What it means to "get rid of MEPs" (Friday, 23 December)

webmaster@w3.org

• Your Account is Suspended For Security Reasons (Wednesday, 7 December)

Yves Lafon

• Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional (Wednesday, 21 December)

Last message date: Tuesday, 27 December 2005 16:07:26 UTC