- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:46:51 -0500
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
In recent discussions, some people have asserted that one measure of benefit of having MEPs in SOAP is whether we've seen more than one binding that supports the same MEP. I just checked and the draft Jabber binding does, as I thought, support http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response/, the same Request/Response pattern that's supported by our standard HTTP binding. See [1]. Presumably, users will get the benefit of having a high degree of similarity in the interfaces needed to support HTTP and Jabber. Interestingly, this also suggests that we'll have to coordinate with the Jabber folks if we make the response envelope optional, drop the Request/Response MEP entirely, etc. as their draft specification clearly depends on our MEP in its current form. Anyway, Jabber's use of our MEP reinforces my feelings that (a) MEPs as we have them in SOAP are a good thing and practical to reuse and (b) that others have dependencies on these aspects of our Recommendation and we should proceed with great caution in making any changes. Noah [1] http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0072.html#binding-patterns -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2005 19:47:07 UTC