- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:13:10 -0500
- To: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Cc: "Xml-Dist-App@W3. Org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, xmlp-comments@w3.org
Anish:
I believe your note accurately reflects the decision we made a couple of
weeks ago. That was a decision I actively supported. As we discussed on
the 12/14 telcon, I've since somewhat changed my position and new think it
may be in the best interest of the community to focus on the ambiguity in
the existing rec, and allow ourselves to make the envelope (but not the
whole response) in the Req/Resp optional, and to document that in an
erratum (see [1]). So, I suppose that's a request to reopen the just
closed Rec39. The alternative, which I think I would also support, would
be to publish a new (and arguably "incompatible") SOAP 1.2 2nd edition,
SOAP 1.2b, SOAP 1.3 with the new feature and take it through a full CR/PR
cycle.
Sorry for any confusion caused by my change of position. Thank you.
Noah
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2005Dec/0010.html
--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
Sent by: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org
12/14/2005 12:48 AM
To: xmlp-comments@w3.org
cc: "Xml-Dist-App@W3. Org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, (bcc: Noah
Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
Subject: Resolution of issue Rec39
At the 07-dec-2005 concall the XMLP WG decided to close issue Rec39 [1]
by including the requirement for an optional-response/empty HTTP
entity-body in the new MEP/binding work that the WG is undertaking.
The WG also decided that per the existing binding defined in SOAP 1.2
[2], it is not possible to send back an empty HTTP entity body for the
non-fault case when using the request-response MEP. The reasons for this
are listed in the email at [3].
-Anish Karmarkar
on behalf of XMLP WG
PS: as the person who raised this issue, I'm happy with the resolution.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-rec-issues.html#x39
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-soap12-part2-20030624/#soapinhttp
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2005Aug/0011.html
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2005 23:13:29 UTC