www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org from June 2003 by thread

RE: XInclude: Interpretation of IURIs depends on how the document is included? Jonathan Marsh (Thursday, 26 June)

Re: XInclude: Interpretation of IURIs depends on how the document is included? Peter McCracken (Thursday, 26 June)

XInclude: Interpretation of IURIs depends on how the document is included? Jonathan Marsh (Thursday, 26 June)

RE: base attributes and Schema Validation Jonathan Marsh (Thursday, 12 June)

xml:base attributes and Schema Validation Peter McCracken (Thursday, 12 June)

NIST test 57 Peter McCracken (Thursday, 12 June)

Fwd: Licensing of test suite Sandra Martinez (Tuesday, 10 June)

DOCTYPEs in result documents Elliotte Harold (Saturday, 7 June)

NIST test 33 and non-existent subresources Elliotte Harold (Saturday, 7 June)

NIST test 17 bad URI Elliotte Harold (Saturday, 7 June)

NIST test case 56 Elliotte Harold (Saturday, 7 June)

NIST test 41 Elliotte Harold (Saturday, 7 June)

Section 4.4 multiple fallback fatal errors Elliotte Harold (Saturday, 7 June)

XInclude XOM implementation report Elliotte Harold (Friday, 6 June)

Standalone nature of included documents Peter McCracken (Thursday, 5 June)

Re: Approved Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com (Thursday, 5 June)

Re: Screensaver Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no (Wednesday, 4 June)

Last message date: Thursday, 26 June 2003 17:59:37 UTC