www-xkms@w3.org from June 2005 by date

Thursday, 30 June 2005

[www-xkms] <none> Vamsi Motukuru
Debriefing teleconf for tuesday 5 June? Jose Kahan

Tuesday, 28 June 2005

Re: (FYI) XKMS WG Charter extended until Sep 2005 Matt Long
Re: (FYI) World Wide Web Consortium Issues XML Key Management System (XKMS) 2.0 as a W3C Recommendation Stephen Farrell
Re: (FYI) XKMS WG Charter extended until Sep 2005 Rich Salz
(FYI) XKMS WG Charter extended until Sep 2005 Jose Kahan
(FYI) World Wide Web Consortium Issues XML Key Management System (XKMS) 2.0 as a W3C Recommendation Jose Kahan

Monday, 27 June 2005

Re: Any examples of actual XKMS applications? Yunhao Zhang
Re: [Fwd: [Announce] XML-Security C++ 1.2 released] Jose Kahan

Sunday, 26 June 2005

[Fwd: [Announce] XML-Security C++ 1.2 released] Berin Lautenbach

Friday, 24 June 2005

Re: [Issue 339-ml] Use of XKMS inside a SOAP 1.2 message Matt Long
Re: [Issue 339-ml] Use of XKMS inside a SOAP 1.2 message Jose Kahan
Re: Any examples of actual XKMS applications? Rich Salz

Thursday, 23 June 2005

Re: [Issue 339-ml] Use of XKMS inside a SOAP 1.2 message Matt Long
Re: [Issue 339-ml] Use of XKMS inside a SOAP 1.2 message Matt Long
Re: [Issue 344-ml] XKMS Schema issue: RequestAbstractType... Jose Kahan
[Issue 344-ml] XKMS Schema issue: RequestAbstractType... Jose Kahan
[Issue 341-ml] Inconsistent definition of RespondWith... Jose Kahan
Any examples of actual XKMS applications? Jose Kahan
Re: [Issue 339-ml] Use of XKMS inside a SOAP 1.2 message Jose Kahan
[mlong@mvsquared.net: Re: [Issue 340-ml] Namespaces Inclusions] Jose Kahan
[Issue 344-ml] Use of terms, RFC[2110], clarity in Sec. 3.2.3[102] Jose Kahan
Re: [Issue 339-ml] Use of XKMS inside a SOAP 1.2 message Matt Long
[Issue 340-ml] Namespaces Inclusions Jose Kahan
Re: Semantic Nit Matt Long
Re: the four (rather one) last remaining open issue Matt Long
[Issue 339-ml] Use of XKMS inside a SOAP 1.2 message Jose Kahan
Re: the four (rather one) last remaining open issue Rich Salz
Re: the four (rather one) last remaining open issue Stephen Farrell
Re: the four (rather one) last remaining open issue Jose Kahan

Wednesday, 22 June 2005

Re: the four (rather one) last remaining open issue Rich Salz
the four (rather one) last remaining open issue Jose Kahan
Re: Semantic Nit Jose Kahan
[Issue 345-ml] Namespace Inclusions Jose Kahan
RE: some quick questions regarding XKMS Ed Simon
[Issue 337-phb] Invalid Web Service definition Jose Kahan
[Issue 342-ml] Improper XML in response examples Jose Kahan
Re: some quick questions regarding XKMS Rich Salz
[Issue 338-tl-2] Typo redundant ; Jose Kahan
[Issue 338-tl-1]: Typo in the description of SOAP body Jose Kahan
some quick questions regarding XKMS Jose Kahan

Tuesday, 21 June 2005

Monday, 20 June 2005

Re: Namespace Inclusions Matt Long
Promotion opportunity for XKMS 2.0: Member testimonials Ian B. Jacobs
Re: Schema Issue Jose Kahan
Re: Namespace Inclusions Jose Kahan
Re: [Issue 346-ml] RSAKeyPair Schema Matt Long
Re: Questions reg. XKMS spec Jose Kahan
[Issue 346-ml] RSAKeyPair Schema Jose Kahan
Re: Questions reg. XKMS spec Jose Kahan
Re: Semantic Nit Rich Salz
Re: Semantic Nit Jose Kahan
Re: Editorial in Part-2 Jose Kahan

Wednesday, 8 June 2005

Re: Issue + Proposal (Section 3.2.3) Tommy Lindberg
Re: Issue + Proposal (Section 3.2.3) Matt Long
Re: Issue + Proposal (Section 3.2.3) Stephen Farrell

Tuesday, 7 June 2005

Re: Issue + Proposal (Section 3.2.3) Matt Long
Re: Issue + Proposal (Section 3.2.3) Stephen Farrell

Thursday, 2 June 2005

Issue + Proposal (Section 3.2.3) Matt Long

Last message date: Thursday, 30 June 2005 19:49:23 UTC