W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > June 2005

Re: Semantic Nit

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:57:16 -0400
Message-ID: <42B6D94C.6000807@datapower.com>
To: jose.kahan@w3.org
CC: Matt Long <mlong@mvsquared.net>, www-xkms@w3.org

I don't think it's uuencoded.  It's the fact that the XKMS messages are 
sent around in "doc/literal" style -- SOA, if you will, literal XML 
documents -- as opposed to SOAP RPC encoding.

Matt's suggesting we don't need to justify that decision, and can remove 
the supporting text that he quoted.

I agree we don't need to justify it (any more, the industry has 
changed), but don't really care if we remove it or not.


Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
Received on Monday, 20 June 2005 14:51:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:31:44 UTC