Re: [Issue 339-ml] Use of XKMS inside a SOAP 1.2 message

Hi Matt,

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 03:52:24PM -0000, Matt Long wrote:

> My comments are off-base, in the fact that Bindings [43] strictly
> associates
> with SOAPv.1.2 and Bindings[53] strictly associates with SOAPv1.1.
> (Sorry 'bout
> that).
 
> Therefore, if Jose's proposed text for [43] is acceptable, then I would
> think
> that 'similar' text is needed for [53] regarding the SOAPv1.1 binding.
> Albeit,
> that a URI equivalence for 'literal' does not exist for SOAPv1.1 in
> terms of
> env:encodingStyle between v1.1 and v1.2.  Therefore, the omission of the
> encodingStyle attribute for SOAPv1.1 is correct syntax for
> env:Envelope
> env:Envelope/env:Body
> env:Envelope/env:Body/*

Your proposal makes sense. I removed the unencoded and added "literal"
instead to p. 53. I left the rest of the text as-is:

<quote>
[53]XKMS implementers using SOAP 1.1 messaging shall use request-response
messaging and carry the XKMS messages as literal content within the SOAP
Body element. The SOAP 1.1 Section 5 encoding model shall not be used.
SOAP 1.1 messages carrying XKMS content shall use the UTF-8 character
encoding to insure interoperability.
</quote>

P. 43 already carries the modifs. we had agreed upon.

I committed to the Editor's draft[2].

-jose

[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS-REC-DRAFT/REC-DRAFT-xkms-part-2.html