- From: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:49:27 +0200
- To: Matt Long <mlong@mvsquared.net>
- Cc: www-xkms@w3.org
Received on Monday, 20 June 2005 15:49:33 UTC
Hi Matt, This is just a confirmation message for closing the decision cycle. The comments you reported[1] were assigned issue id 346-ml. Your proposed change was declined. See the text here below. Please reply to this message if you have any objections. [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/pr-issues/issues.html#346-ml Thanks, -jose -------------- >Is there a reason why the RSAKeyPair schema component does not >extend ds:RSAKeyValue? I think the answer's probably: "nope - no particular reason". Is there a reason we ought to extend that rather than just re-use the ds:CryptoBinary as we've done? >It appears to me to somewhat redundant to redefine exponent and modulus I guess it is a little, but can't see the harm really >just to get them both in the same namespace for XKMS purposes...or >maybe that *is* the point. Maybe that was it all right. I guess mixing up namespaces is would possibly be a little more error prone (at coding time) than doing as we've done.
Received on Monday, 20 June 2005 15:49:33 UTC