- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:11:04 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Sep/0000.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1a. Bijan has left the WG.
b. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
Asir Vedamuthu, Paul Downey, Philippe Le Hegaret, Tom Jordahl,
Anish Karmarkar, Glen Daniels, Amelia Lewis, Youenn Fablet,
Jean-Jacques Moreau, Allen Brookes
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes:
- July 20 [.1]
[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/att-0087/2006072
0-ws-desc-minutes.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items [.1].
[Interop]
? 2006-07-06: [interop] Jonathan - create validation-report
stylesheet.
? 2006-07-07: [interop] John to write spec text for transfer
coding
? 2006-07-20: [interop] Jonathan to add timestamps to result
stylesheet.
WG
? 2005-07-21: Pauld to write a proposal for a working group
report for requirements for schema evolution
following closure of LC124
? 2006-03-30: Marsh to make XSLT improvements for RDF
publication.
? 2006-06-29: Philippe to write up recommended text to clarify
the issue in CR53.
? 2006-07-06: Glen to contribute some extension test cases.
? 2006-07-06: John to write proposal for CR055 based on
discussion and Jacek's email.
? 2006-07-13: Roberto to produce an updated proposal for CR044.
? 2006-07-20: Arthur to update "Proposed Part 1 Text for
REQUIRED Extension Properties".
Current Editorial Action Items
- none -
Note: Editorial AIs associated with LC issues recorded at [.2].
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/actions_owner.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
a. SPARQL wsdl bug [.1]
b. WSDL 1.1 schemas [.2]
c. Multiple ports [.3]
d. Future telcons:
- Sept 14th: Features "at risk" discussion
- Sept 28th: RDF Mapping issues [.4]
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0127.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0059.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0069.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Aug/0008.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
5. Issue CR044: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with each
other [.1]
- Reopen this issue to change the syntax? [.2]
- Components of the latest proposal:
+ Roberto [.3]
+ Jacek [.4]
+ amendment? "applies to" terminology [.5, .6]
+ amendment? don't mention interface [.7]
- ACTION: Roberto to produce an updated proposal for CR044
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR044
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0010.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0046.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0014.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0047.html
[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0054.html
[.7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0055.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
6. Issue CR055: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding [.1]
- Arthur's proposal [.2]
- ACTION: John to write proposal for CR055 based on discussion and
Jacek's email
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR055
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0087.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
7. Issue CR022: Component Values Must Be Context Independent [.1]
- Terminology clarification [.2]
- WS-Addressing example [.3]
- Arthur's proposed clarification [.4]
- Proposal for part a [.5] accepted
- Proposal for part b [.6]
- Roberto's amendment [.7]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR022
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0101.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0128.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0034.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0079.html
[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0080.html
[.7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0086.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
8. Issue CR053: Allow absolute URI in {location} [.1]
- ACTION: Philippe to write up recommended text to clarify the
issue in CR53
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR053
-----------------------------------------------------------------
9. Issue CR069: Deconstructing MEPs [.1]
- Amy's pushback [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR069
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0036.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue CR052: Serializing only part of the body with HTTP binding
[.1]
- ACTION: Jacek to draft a response to Eric re: CR052 explaining that
this represents a new use case, and that we will not be able
to address this as such in the spec, but that it can be
addressed as an additional extension... [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR052
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0034.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue CR054: URIPath feedback [.1]
- ACTION: Jacek to write a response to Eric correcting his
interpretation of the text as described in CR054 [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR054
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jul/0035.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue CR045: Inline schemas with no target namespace [.1]
- Status quo [.2]
- ACTION: Paul to address the issues in CR45 regarding schema
without namespace [.3]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR045
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006May/0097.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jun/0025.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue CR059: Editorial: Where does {http location ignore uncited}
appear? [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR059
-----------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue CR061: service and binding name shown as QNames in
example - should be NCNames [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR061
-----------------------------------------------------------------
15. Issue CR062: Re:service and binding name shown as QNames in
example - should be NCNames [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR062
-----------------------------------------------------------------
16. Issue CR063: Prefix declarations in inlined schema [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR063
-----------------------------------------------------------------
17. Issue CR066: Endpoint component {name} property vs xml
representation
as a QName [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR066
-----------------------------------------------------------------
18. Issue CR068: WSDL 2.0 part 2 comment - 2.3.x, 2.2.x wording problems
[.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR068
-----------------------------------------------------------------
19. Issue CR064: WSDL 2.0 primer CR comments [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR064
-----------------------------------------------------------------
20. Issue CR065: Re: WSDL 2.0 primer CR comments [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR065
-----------------------------------------------------------------
21. Issue CR077: URI comparison [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR077
-----------------------------------------------------------------
22. Issue CR078: XML Schema requires a type in addition to name to
identify an element [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR078
-----------------------------------------------------------------
23. Issue CR078: XML Schema requires a type in addition to name to
identify an element [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR078
-----------------------------------------------------------------
24. Issue CR079: Fragment identifier syntax not XPointer
Framework-compatible [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR079
-----------------------------------------------------------------
25. Issue CR021: Re: WSDL describing Interface operation safety [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR021
-----------------------------------------------------------------
26. Features "at risk"
- Features and Properties [.1] Director's decision [.2]
+ collecting data on f&p deployment
- HTTP Binding
+ awaiting data from implementers
- MEPs?
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2006Apr/0014.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Dec/0023.html
Received on Tuesday, 5 September 2006 21:12:04 UTC