- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:15:15 +0100
- To: <alewis@tibco.com>, <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <matthew@stickledown.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Amy said: > I hope that at least the issue is expressed as "WSDL does not > constrain the contents of the xsi:type attribute," that might sound like a better summary of the issue, though it seems the concern is that a service exposes a GED of "doStuff" and a top level xsi:type could subvert that to a "PuttingTheKettleOnType" to "LaunchingNuclearMissilesType", which sounds more like our operation dispatching discussion to me. Otherwise it's just XML Schema, something some of us are stuck in a loveless marriage with, it seems. > because I think that this is more accurate than the submitted subject > line (with respect to the submitter; the fact that the > industry has to stand on its head and hold its jaw in odd > positions in order to make W3C XML Schema meet requirements > is *not* in fact something that should necessarily force WSDL > to specify how to override or constrain those contortions). generic issues with using XML Schema for Web service description might have more joy here: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding or not :-) Paul
Received on Monday, 4 September 2006 11:15:33 UTC