Agenda for TAG teleconference of 26 April 2012

The agenda for the TAG teleconference of 26 April 2012 is now available at 
[1,2], and in text-only form below. Thank you.

Noah

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/26-agenda
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/tag-weekly

===========================================================

    [1]W3C | [2]TAG | Previous: [3]19 April 2012 This: [4]26 April
    2012 Next: [5]3 May 2012

       [1] http://www.w3.org/
       [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
       [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/19-agenda
       [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/26-agenda
       [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/05/03-agenda

                Agenda of 26 April 2012 TAG Teleconference

    Nearby: [6]TAG work plan - [7]Teleconference details -
    [8]issues list - [9]open actions - [10]pending review actions -
    [11]www-tag archive - [12]tag archive
     1. Convene
           + Chair: Noah Mendelsohn, Scribe: Robin Berjon
             (confirmed)
           + Regrets: Peter Linss, Larry Masinter
           + Future regrets: None
           + Agenda Review - [13]this agenda
           + Next Meeting: 3 May 2012, Chair: Noah Mendelsohn
           + Future scribes: Jeni Tennison, Larry Masinter,
             Jonathan Rees
     2. Approve minutes of prior meeting(s)
           + [14]2-4 April 2012 (F2F — Sophia-Antipolis, FR)
           + [15]12 April 2012 (if available in time)
           + [16]19 April 2012
     3. Administrative items
           + Verify that group is agreeable to Noah's [17]proposal
             for addressing [18]ACTION-687 (on references to
             unstable specs) without taking telcon time
     4. Close pending Actions without discussion
           + The chair suggests that the following actions are
             ready to close without further discussion. If that
             proves incorrect, any necessary discussion will
             defered until the other [19]Pending Review Items slot
             later in this call.
           + Actions to be closed:
                o [20]ACTION-664: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Announce
                  completion of TAG work on Microdata/RDFa as
                  recorded in
                  http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmldata.html
                  and to finalize the product page and associated
                  links - Due: 2012-05-01 - PENDING REVIEW —
                  [21]e-mail announcing completion of
                  Microdata/RDFa work
     5. [22]ACTION-656: Getting W3C to Invest in Technologies for
        Liberal XML processing (XML-ER):
           + Goal:
                o Consider whether the [23]XML Error Recovery
                  Community Group effort is adopting the right
                  goals and use cases
                o If appropriate, identify recommended changes to
                  [24]XML-ER charter and next steps in ensuring
                  these are taken to the XML-ER group
           + Background
                o [25]XML-ER Group Home Page
                o E-mail from Jeni Tennison: [26]frame discussion
                  of XML-ER goals and use cases
                o [27]ACTION-696: on - Jeni Tennison - frame
                  discussion of XML-ER goals and use cases - Due:
                  2012-04-24 - PENDING REVIEW
                o Relating to TAG discussion at the April 2012 F2F:
                     # On [28]15 March 2012 Henry Thompson
                       requested F2F discussion
                     # [29]Minutes of 3 April 2012 F2F discussion
                       of XML-ER
                     # [30]ACTION-686: on - Robin Berjon - try to
                       find who is in charge of the current browser
                       content sniffing clustermess, and see if
                       there is a way of moving out of the quagmire
                       - Due: 2012-05-01 - OPEN
                     # [31]ACTION-687: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Look
                       for opportunities to discuss putting forward
                       something to the AB about the Process and
                       the failed reference from REC drafts to
                       expired RFCs as a side-effect of scope creep
                       etc. - Due: 2012-04-24 - OPEN (after some
                       e-mail discussion Noah has [32]proposed a
                       way forward that will not require telcon
                       time) — see [33]Administrative items above
                o [34]ACTION-656: on - Noah Mendelsohn - Schedule
                  discussion of possibly getting W3C to invest in
                  technologies for liberal XML processing (e.g.
                  XML5) - Due: 2012-04-24 - PENDING REVIEW
     6. TAG Election Procedures
           + Goals:
                o Understand concerns that have been raised about
                  TAG election procedures
                o Decide what role, if any, it's appropriate for
                  the TAG to play in addressing such concerns
                o If based on the above considerations it's
                  appropriate for the TAG to get involved,
                  investigate the merits of the concerns raised,
                  and decide on next steps
           + Background:
                o Robin Berjon has made [35]proposals for
                  "reforming" the TAG election process
                o The chair (Noah) has [36]commented "...changes to
                  the W3C process are formally the responsibility
                  of the AB, W3C management and the AC. Normally,
                  we don't discuss process issues on the TAG,
                  except when they affect our ability to do our
                  technical work [...] Obviously, changing the
                  processes relating to the TAG itself is a special
                  case, and I'm fine with scheduling some informal
                  brainstorming". Larry [37]raises a similar
                  concern. The chair then [38]wrote: "we will have
                  a brief discussion of this on Thursday, and we
                  will do it with the understanding that any formal
                  work on changing the process is coordinated by
                  the AB/Team/AC."
                o See also extensive e-mail thread(s) with subject
                  [39]TAG productivity, elections, and httpRange-14
                  (but note that for discussion on 25 April, the
                  chair intends to limit the scope to election
                  reform, and not to broader questions of TAG
                  findings, TAG effectiveness, etc.)
     7. Pending Review Items:
           + [40]Pending review actions in [41]Tracker
     8. Overdue Action Items:
           + [42]Overdue actions in [43]Tracker
     9. Any other business
      __________________________________________________________

       [6] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/
       [7] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#telcon
       [8] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues
       [9] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/open
      [10] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview
      [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/
      [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/
      [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/26-agenda
      [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/02-agenda
      [15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/12-minutes
      [16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/19-minutes
      [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0185.html
      [18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/687
      [20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/664
      [21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/26-agenda
      [22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/656
      [23] 
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/XML%20Error%20Recovery%20Community%20Group
      [24] http://www.w3.org/community/xml-er/wiki/Charter
      [25] http://www.w3.org/community/xml-er/
      [26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0169.html
      [27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/696
      [28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/03/15-minutes
      [29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/03-minutes#item04
      [30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/686
      [31] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/687
      [32] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0185.html
      [34] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/656
      [35] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0105.html
      [36] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0143.html
      [37] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0147.html
      [38] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0151.html
      [39] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0153.html
      [40] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview
      [41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/
      [42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue?sort=owner
      [43] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/


     Noah Mendelsohn for the TAG
     $Revision: 1.1 $ of $Date: 2012/04/25 16:42:49 $

    [44]Valid XHTML 1.1

      [44] http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer

Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 16:45:02 UTC