- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:36:05 -0700
- To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>
>From the TAG charter http://www.w3.org/2004/10/27-tag-charter.html : "The TAG's scope is limited to technical issues about Web architecture. The TAG should not consider administrative, process, or organizational policy issues of W3C, which are generally addressed by the W3C Advisory Committee, Advisory Board, and Team." So I don't think a discussion of TAG election process is in order for a TAG meeting, since it is an organizational policy issue of W3C. I'd be glad to participate in a discussion of TAG election process, but I don't think it should be part of a scheduled TAG meeting. I would not have the same objection to a discussion of specific proposals about how the TAG could operate to fulfill its charter (and in particular, to produce 'Architectural Recommendations', which are in the charter, and not 'Findings', which are not), but that's a separate topic from election process. Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net
Received on Monday, 23 April 2012 18:36:39 UTC