W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2012

Re: TAG election reform

From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:21:51 -0400
Message-ID: <4F95C7EF.4020403@arcanedomain.com>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
CC: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>
Just to be clear: we will have a brief discussion of this on Thursday, and 
we will do it with the understanding that any formal work on changing the 
process is coordinated by the AB/Team/AC. Thank you.


On 4/23/2012 4:48 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2012, at 20:36 , Larry Masinter wrote:
>>  From the TAG charter http://www.w3.org/2004/10/27-tag-charter.html :
>> "The TAG's scope is limited to technical issues about Web architecture. The TAG should not consider administrative, process, or organizational policy issues of W3C, which are generally addressed by the W3C Advisory Committee, Advisory Board, and Team."
>> So I don't think a discussion of TAG election process is in order for a TAG meeting, since it is an organizational policy issue of W3C.  I'd be glad to participate in a discussion of TAG election process, but I don't think it should be part of a scheduled TAG meeting.
> Well we could spend a while talking about whether we should talk about it or not; or we could spend five minutes giving +1/-1 (I'm happy for that to take place in email if you prefer) and move on. I don't mind taking my proposal straight to the AB, but it is customary for groups to have a say in how they operate.
Received on Monday, 23 April 2012 21:22:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:44 UTC