W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2016

Re: Proposal for animation-pause property

From: Michael Gro▀klaus <mail@mgrossklaus.de>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 09:32:27 +0200
Cc: Rachel Nabors <rachelnabors@gmail.com>, Estelle Weyl <estelle@weyl.org>, www-style@w3.org
Message-Id: <154E49A5-CA25-4AFD-A9BC-270000675F48@mgrossklaus.de>
To: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>
Usually none, which would be the expected behavior to me for an iteration-delay if I don't apply a specific value (since 'none' is the default fill-mode value).


> Am 09.05.2016 um 09:01 schrieb Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>:
> 
> On 2016/05/09 15:54, Michael Gro▀klaus wrote:
>> 
>>> I believe that when we looked at adding iteration delay in Web
>>> Animations the main challenge was fill modes--do you apply the
>>> backwards fill or the forwards fill, i.e. do you hold the final value
>>> of the previous iteration, or the first value of the next? I suspect
>>> you want to be able to do either which then suggests you need more
>>> fill mode values so it becomes more complex. (Sequence effects at
>>> least let you reuse the existing fill modes to get different behaviors.)
>> 
>> Maybe I'm missing something, but why not just use the existing
>> animation-fill-mode? Of course, you could implement a new fill-mode
>> property and there might be a use case for it (which I don't see at the
>> moment)... but in my opinion it would not be mandatory because you could
>> just use the current animation-fill-mode (which would be much more
>> useful imho anyway).
> 
> What value do you use to fill to use between iterations?
> 
> 


Received on Monday, 9 May 2016 07:32:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:59 UTC