- From: Bruno Racineux <bruno@hexanet.net>
- Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 15:36:35 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 5/1/15 6:22 AM, "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >I'd have been ok with 'reset' (since it effectively "resets" the state >to what it was at the beginning of your cascade origin), but this is a >good point. > >However, I also don't want to use a term that is technically *incorrect* >(which makes it *more* difficult for people to understand how things >actually work!) so ua-default or browser-default or anything like that >is IMHO not acceptable. I agree. I don't think 'ua' or 'default' properly convey what it does. If the feature resets to the previous origin. Why not call it like it is: 'origin'? Or 'reset-origin'. But 'reset' doesn't have much value either. 'initial' already refers to a previous state. i.e. 'reset-to-initial-state' 'origin' carries the same meaning, with an added technical education value. >On 4/23/15 5:47 AM, "Simon Pieters" <simonp@opera.com> wrote: >Origin on the Web usually means origin as in the same-origin-policy. Unless 'origin' has some kind of future application relative to 'same-origin-policy' for which it should be reserved for. I don't see an issue using that keyword for CSS since it matches the spec terminology.
Received on Friday, 1 May 2015 22:37:04 UTC