- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 06:26:57 -0700
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, Simon Montagu <smontagu@smontagu.org>, www-style@w3.org
On 04/21/2015 01:44 AM, Richard Ishida wrote: > On 21/04/2015 08:56, Simon Montagu wrote: >>> I bring this up because I see a testcase which tests 20000/20001 fails >>> >on our impl [2], but AFAICS, the behavior of WebKit/Blink matches ours >>> >(except that they don't reorder the marker text correctly.) And I think >>> >that test should be rejected. >>> > >>> >[1]http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/#hebrew >>> >[2] >>> >http://www.w3.org/International/tests/repo/results/predefined-counter-styles#simplenumeric >>> > >>> >- Xidorn >> I agree that the implication in the test that Hebrew counter style must >> only be implemented up to a fixed ceiling is problematical. > > > the test currently reflects what the spec says. If the spec is changed, > then the test can be changed too. The CSSWG resolved to allow implementations to implement past the ceiling (but must implement up to the ceiling, of course, and must use the fallback style for whatever happens after the UA's own ceiling). So that means the test needs to allow two different renderings: one with the fallback, one with a correct Hebrew numeric representation. (CSSWG reftests can express this requirement by linking to two separate references.) Simon, is there any number that is definitively past the limits of the numbering system? ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 1 May 2015 13:27:52 UTC