- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:09:24 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 06/16/2015 03:51 AM, Javier Fernandez wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/16/2015 03:44 AM, fantasai wrote: >> So with some prompting from Rachel Andrews I finally did that today. :) >> > > I think this addition is great, just mention that a similar effect can > be done via Content Distribution alignment, but having something to add > directly to the grid syntax would be more powerful, indeed. Sure, the difference though is that Content Distribution distributes only free space, whereas this is a fixed length. >> Except, as per usual, I ran into some issues. >> >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-grid-1/#gutters >> >> Issue 1: Should 'normal' (the initial value of 'row-gap') compute to '0'? >> >> I say yes, since this would be simpler for authors. Other opinions >> welcome. > > Yes, I agree it'd be the best option. I wonder, though, which effect it > would have an 'auto' value for this property. I mean, trying not to be > redundant with Content Distribution alignment. The gaps are just fixed lengths. Content Distribution distributes free space. It's kindof like 'letter-spacing' and 'text-align: justify' -- space between letters is the sum of both effects. > Should we have any overflow handling logic for these gaps ? Perhaps > something similar to what Box Alignment provides, so we can reduce > proportionally all gaps to fit in container's size. No, I don't think so. The gap should just be a minimum, and you can add alignment on top of that. Just like margins. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2015 18:09:55 UTC